Coupang, Inc. Securities Fraud Class Action Result of Data Breach and Stock Decline – Investors may Contact Lewis Kahn, Esq, at Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC

Coupang, Inc. Securities Fraud Class Action Result of Data Breach and Stock Decline – Investors may Contact Lewis Kahn, Esq, at Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC

NEW YORK & NEW ORLEANS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) and KSF partner, former Attorney General of Louisiana, Charles C. Foti, Jr., remind investors with substantial losses that they have untilFebruary 17, 2026 to file lead plaintiff applications in a securities class action lawsuit against Coupang, Inc. (NYSE: CPNG), if they purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s securities between August 6, 2025 and December 16, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This action is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

What You May Do

If you purchased securities of Coupang and would like to discuss your legal rights and how this case might affect you and your right to recover for your economic loss, you may, without obligation or cost to you, contact KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn toll-free at 1-877-515-1850 or via email ([email protected]), or visit https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nyse-cpng/ to learn more. If you wish to serve as a lead plaintiff in this class action, you must petition the Court by February 17, 2026.

About the Lawsuit

Coupang and certain of its executives are charged with failing to disclose material information during the Class Period, violating federal securities laws.

The alleged false and misleading statements and omissions include, but are not limited to, that: (i) the Company had inadequate cybersecurity protocols that allowed a former employee to access sensitive customer information for nearly six months without being detected; (ii) this subjected the Company to a materially heightened risk of regulatory and legal scrutiny; (iii) when defendants became aware that the Company had been subjected to this data breach, they did not report it in a current report filing in compliance with applicable Securities and Exchange Commission reporting rules; and (iv) as a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all times.

The case is Barry v. Coupang, Inc., et al., No. 25-cv-10795.

About Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC

KSF, whose partners include former Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr., is one of the nation’s premier boutique securities litigation law firms. This past year, KSF was ranked by SCAS among the top 10 firms nationally based upon total settlement value. KSF serves a variety of clients, including public and private institutional investors, and retail investors – in seeking recoveries for investment losses emanating from corporate fraud or malfeasance by publicly traded companies. KSF has offices in New York, Delaware, California, Louisiana, Chicago, and a representative office in Luxembourg.

TOP 10 Plaintiff Law Firms – According to ISS Securities Class Action Services

To learn more about KSF, you may visit www.ksfcounsel.com.

CONNECT WITH US: Facebook || Instagram || YouTube || TikTok || LinkedIn

Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC

Lewis Kahn, Managing Partner

[email protected]

1-877-515-1850

1100 Poydras St., Suite 960

New Orleans, LA 70163

KEYWORDS: Louisiana New York United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Class Action Lawsuit Professional Services Legal

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

Freeport McMoRan Inc. Investors (FCX) with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Investor Class Action Lawsuit

PR Newswire

SAN DIEGO, Dec. 19, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (NYSE: FCX) publicly traded securities between February 15, 2022 and September 24, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), have until Monday, January 12, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Freeport-McMoRan class action lawsuit. Captioned Reed v. Freeport-McMoRan Inc., No. 25-cv-04243 (D. Ariz.), the Freeport-McMoRan class action lawsuit charges Freeport-McMoRan as well as certain of Freeport-McMoRan’s top current and former executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Freeport-McMoRan class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:


https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-freeport-mcmoran-inc-class-action-lawsuit-fcx.html
 

You can also contact attorneys

J.C. Sanchez

or

Jennifer N. Caringal

of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at

[email protected]

.

CASE ALLEGATIONS: Freeport-McMoRan engages in the mining of mineral properties in North America, South America, and Indonesia. Freeport-McMoRan operates the Grasberg Copper and Gold Mine in Papua, Indonesia, in which the Indonesian government holds a commercial interest, according to the complaint.

The Freeport-McMoRan class action lawsuit alleges that throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statement and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Freeport-McMoRan did not adequately ensure safety at the Grasberg Block Cave mine in Indonesia; (ii) the lack of proper safety precautions constituted a heightened risk that could foreseeably lead to the death of Freeport-McMoRan’s workers; and (iii) this constituted an undisclosed heightened risk of regulatory, litigation, and reputational risk.

The Freeport-McMoRan class action lawsuit further alleges that on September 9, 2025, Freeport-McMoRan disclosed that “a large flow of wet material from a production drawpoint occurred at one of five production blocks in the Grasberg Block Cave underground mine,” which “blocked access to certain areas within the mine, restricting evacuation routes for seven team members.” Freeport-McMoRan further allegedly disclosed that “[m]ining operations in the Grasberg minerals district have been temporarily suspended to prioritize the safe evacuation of the seven contractor workers.” On this news, the price of Freeport-McMoRan stock fell nearly 6%, according to the complaint.

Then, on September 24, 2025, the complaint further alleges that Freeport-McMoRan revealed that “two team members . . . were regrettably fatally injured in the September 8th incident,” “[e]xtensive efforts are ongoing in the search for five [PT Freeport Indonesia (“PTFI”)] team members who remain missing,” and “mining operations in the Grasberg minerals district have been temporarily suspended since September 8th.” Freeport-McMoRan allegedly further disclosed that “PTFI production in 2026 could potentially be approximately 35% lower than pre-incident estimates.” On this news, the price of Freeport-McMoRan stock fell nearly 17%, according to the complaint.

Finally, on September 25, 2025, the Freeport-McMoRan class action lawsuit alleges that Bloomberg published an article entitled “Freeport Mine Setback Risks Fraying Relations With Indonesia,” which stated, in pertinent part, that “[a] halt in production at the giant Grasberg copper mine in Indonesia looks set to strain the fractious relationship between Freeport-McMoRan Inc. and its host nation, at a time when the Jakarta government was already looking to take greater control.” The complaint alleges that on this news, the price of Freeport-McMoRan stock fell more than 6%.

THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Freeport-McMoRan publicly traded securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Freeport-McMoRan class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Freeport-McMoRan investor class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Freeport-McMoRan shareholder class action lawsuit. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Freeport-McMoRan class action lawsuit.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world’s leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs’ firms in the world, and the Firm’s attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:


https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. 

Contact:

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal
655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101
800-449-4900
[email protected] 

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/freeport-mcmoran-inc-investors-fcx-with-substantial-losses-have-opportunity-to-lead-investor-class-action-lawsuit-302647376.html

SOURCE Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP

Intercont (Cayman) Limited Receives Nasdaq Notification Letter Regarding Minimum Bid Price Deficiency

HONG KONG, Dec. 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Intercont (Cayman) Limited (“NCT”, the “Company”, or “we”) (NASDAQ: NCT), a global carbon-neutral shipping company, today announced that, on December 15, 2025, the Company received a notification letter (the “Notification Letter”) from the Listing Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), notifying the Company that it is currently not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement set forth under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). The Notification Letter is based upon the fact that the closing bid price of the Company’s ordinary shares (“Ordinary Shares”) was below $1.00 per share for a period of 30 consecutive business days from October 31, 2025 to December 12, 2025.

This press release is issued pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(b), which requires prompt disclosure of receipt of a deficiency notification. The Notification Letter has no immediate effect on the listing of the Company’s Ordinary Shares, which will continue to trade uninterrupted on Nasdaq under the ticker “NCT”.

Pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Company has a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until June 15, 2026 (the “Compliance Period”), to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s minimum bid price requirement. If at any time during the Compliance Period, the closing bid price per share of the Company’s Ordinary Shares is at least $1.00 for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days, Nasdaq will provide the Company a written confirmation of compliance and the matter will be closed.

In the event the Company does not regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement by June 15, 2026, the Company may be eligible for additional time of grace period. To qualify, the Company will be required to meet the continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares and all other initial listing standards for The Nasdaq Capital Market, with the exception of the bid price requirement, and will need to provide written notice of its intention to cure the deficiency during the second compliance period, including by effecting a reverse stock split, if necessary.

About Intercont (Cayman) Limited 

Intercont (Cayman) Limited is a global shipping enterprise with plans for seaborne pulping operations. Under a visionary management team, Intercont is dedicated to providing customers with efficient and environmentally friendly transportation solutions through innovative business models and technology. For more information, please visit: https://www.intercontcayman.com.  

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains statements of a forward-looking nature. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements that are other than statements of historical facts. When the Company uses words such as “may, “will, “intend,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate” or similar expressions that do not relate solely to historical matters, it is making forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations discussed in the forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to uncertainties and risks including, but not limited to, the uncertainties related to market conditions and the completion of the initial public offering on the anticipated terms or at all, and other factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of the registration statement filed with the SEC. For these reasons, among others, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements in this press release. Additional factors are discussed in the Company’s filings with the SEC, which are available for review at www.sec.gov. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof.

Contact information:
[email protected]
+852-3848-1720



FFIV INVESTOR ALERT: F5, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead the F5 Class Action Lawsuit

PR Newswire

SAN DIEGO, Dec. 19, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that the F5 class action lawsuit – captioned Smith v. F5, Inc., No. 25-cv-02619 (W.D. Wash.) – seeks to represent purchasers or acquirers of F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) securities and charges F5 and certain of F5’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the F5 class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:


https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-f5-inc-class-action-lawsuit-ffiv.html

You can also contact attorneys

J.C. Sanchez

or

Jennifer N. Caringal

of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at

[email protected]

.  Lead plaintiff motions for the F5 class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than February 17, 2026.

CASE ALLEGATIONS: F5 is a global multi-cloud application security and delivery company which enables customers to deploy, secure, and operate applications on-premises or via public cloud.

The F5 class action lawsuit alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants created the false impression that they possessed reliable information pertaining to F5’s projected revenue outlook and anticipated growth while also minimizing risk from seasonality and macroeconomic fluctuations.  The complaint alleges that in truth, F5’s optimistic claims, touting its purported best-in-industry security and overall emphasis and confidence in F5’s ability to meet and capitalize on the growing security needs for its clientele fell short of reality; F5 was, at the time, the subject of a significant security incident, placing its clientele’s security and F5’s future prospects at significant risk.

The F5 class action lawsuit further alleges that on October 15, 2025, F5 disclosed that “[i]n August 2025, we learned a highly sophisticated nation-state threat actor maintained long-term, persistent access to, and downloaded files from, certain F5 systems.  These systems included our BIG-IP product development environment and engineering knowledge management platforms.”  On this news, the price of F5 stock fell nearly 14% over two trading days, according to the complaint.

Then, on October 27, 2025, the F5 class action lawsuit further alleges that F5 published its fourth quarter fiscal year 2025 results, providing significantly below-market growth expectations for fiscal 2026 due in significant part to the security breach as F5 announced expected reductions to sales and renewals, elongated sales cycles, terminated projections, and increased expenses attributed to ongoing remediation efforts.  Defendants also allegedly disclosed that BIG-IP, the product that was the subject of the security breach, is F5’s highest revenue product.  On this news, the price of F5 stock fell nearly 11% over two trading days, according to the complaint.

THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired F5 securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the F5 class action lawsuit.  A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class.  A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the F5 investor class action lawsuit.  The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the F5 shareholder class action lawsuit.  An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the F5 class action lawsuit.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world’s leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation.  Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors.  In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS.  With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs’ firms in the world, and the Firm’s attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig.  Please visit the following page for more information:


https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. 

Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. 

Contact:
            Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
            J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal
            655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101
            800-449-4900
            [email protected] 

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ffiv-investor-alert-f5-inc-investors-with-substantial-losses-have-opportunity-to-lead-the-f5-class-action-lawsuit-302647391.html

SOURCE Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP

VanEck Announces Year-End Distributions for VanEck Equity ETFs

VanEck Announces Year-End Distributions for VanEck Equity ETFs

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–VanEck announced today the following 2025 annual distributions per share for its VanEck® equity exchange-traded funds.

Distributions Per Share for the VanEck ETFs Listed Below

Ex-Date: December 22, 2025 | Record Date: December 22, 2025 | Payable Date: December 26, 2025

Fund

Ticker

 

Income

Approximate %

of Income from

PFICs

Short-Term

Capital Gain

Long-Term

Capital Gain

VanEck Africa Index ETF

AFK

$0.2716

5%

None

None

VanEck Biotech ETF

BBH

$0.9565

None

None

None

VanEck Gaming ETF

BJK

$1.3636

None

None

None

VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF

BRF

$0.8889

1%

None

None

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF

BUZZ

None

None

None

None

VanEck ChiNext ETF

CNXT

$0.0788

None

None

None

VanEck Oil Refiners ETF

CRAK

$0.7561

None

None

None

VanEck Digital Transformation ETF

DAPP

None

None

None

None

VanEck Digital India ETF

DGIN

$0.1333

10%

$0.1351

$0.5098

VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF

ESPO

$1.2890

19%

None

None

VanEck Environmental Services ETF

EVX

$0.0714

None

None

None

VanEck Gold Miners ETF

GDX

$0.6331

25%

None

None

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF

GDXJ

$2.6494

87%

None

None

VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF

GLIN

$0.3884

28%

None

None

VanEck Green Metals ETF

GMET

$0.6827

35%

None

None

VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF

GPZ

$0.2247

34%

None

None

VanEck Natural Resources ETF

HAP

$1.3636

None

None

None

Fund

Ticker

 

Income

Approximate %

of Income from

PFICs

Short-Term

Capital Gain

Long-Term

Capital Gain

VanEck Robotics ETF

IBOT

$0.2000

None

None

None

VanEck Indonesia Index ETF

IDX

$0.3438

13%

None

None

VanEck Israel ETF

ISRA

$0.8691

27%

None

None

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

MOAT

$1.4038

None

None

None

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

MOO

$1.7975

None

None

None

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

MOTG

$0.9375

3%

$1.8899

$ 4.0549

VanEck Morningstar International Moat ETF

MOTI

$1.1821

50%

None

None

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF

MVAL

$0.6333

None

None

None

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETF

NLR

$3.1661

78%

None

None

VanEck Onchain Economy ETF

NODE

$0.2935

76%

$0.0961

None

VanEck Oil Services ETF

OIH

$4.8690

None

None

None

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

PIT

$4.7083

None

None

None

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

REMX

$1.3008

84%

None

None

VanEck Russia ETF

RSX

$0.0119

None

None

None

VanEck Russia Small-Cap ETF

RSXJ

$1.5396

None

None

None

VanEck Retail ETF

RTH

$2.4205

16%

None

None

VanEck Steel ETF

SLX

$1.3158

None

None

None

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

SMH

$1.1047

None

None

None

VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF

SMHX

$0.0090

None

None

None

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF

SMOG

$2.0340

None

None

None

VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF

SMOT

$0.4975

13%

None

None

VanEck Vietnam ETF

VNM

$0.0380

None

None

None

The majority, and possibly all, of the dividend distributions will be paid out of net investment income earned by the Funds. A portion of these distributions may come from net short-term or long-term realized capital gains or return of capital.

The final tax treatment of these dividends will be reported to shareholders on their 1099-DIV form, which is mailed after the close of each calendar year. The amount of dividends paid by each ETF may vary from time to time. Past dividend amounts are no guarantee of future dividend payment amounts.

Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) Income: Several VanEck ETFs may make investments in non-U.S. corporations classified as “passive foreign investment companies”. Generally speaking, PFICs are non-U.S. corporations having 50% or more of their assets invested in cash or securities, or having 75% or more of their gross income originating from passive sources, including but not limited to interest, dividends and rents. In other words, these foreign companies primarily derive their revenue streams from investments (rather than operations). Please refer to your VanEck ETF’s Statement of Additional Information (SAI) for further information on PFICs.

IRS Circular 230 disclosure: VanEck does not provide legal, tax or accounting advice. Any statement contained in this communication concerning U.S. tax matters is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed on the relevant taxpayer. Shareholders or potential shareholders of the VanEck ETFs should obtain their own independent tax advice based on their particular circumstances.

If you have any questions concerning this information or the VanEck ETFs in general, please call 800.826.2333 between 9:00 am and 5:30 pm ET, Monday through Friday.

About VanEck

VanEck has a history of looking beyond the financial markets to identify trends that are likely to create impactful investment opportunities. We were one of the first U.S. asset managers to offer investors access to international markets. This set the tone for the firm’s drive to identify asset classes and trends – including gold investing in 1968, emerging markets in 1993, and exchange traded funds in 2006 – that subsequently shaped the investment management industry.

Today, VanEck offers active and passive strategies with compelling exposures supported by well-designed investment processes. As of November 30, 2025, VanEck managed approximately $174.7 billion in assets, including mutual funds, ETFs and institutional accounts. The firm’s capabilities range from core investment opportunities to more specialized exposures to enhance portfolio diversification. Our actively managed strategies are fueled by in-depth, bottom-up research and security selection from portfolio managers with direct experience in the sectors and regions in which they invest. Investability, liquidity, diversity, and transparency are key to the experienced decision-making around market and index selection underlying VanEck’s passive strategies.

Since our founding in 1955, putting our clients’ interests first, in all market environments, has been at the heart of the firm’s mission.

The principal risks of investing in VanEck ETFs include sector, market, economic, political, foreign currency, world event, index tracking, active management, social media analytics, derivatives, blockchain, commodities and non-diversification risks, as well as fluctuations in net asset value and the risks associated with investing in less developed capital markets. The Funds may loan their securities, which may subject them to additional credit and counterparty risk. ETFs that invest in high-yield securities are subject to subject to risks associated with investing in high-yield securities; which include a greater risk of loss of income and principal than funds holding higher-rated securities; concentration risk; credit risk; hedging risk; interest rate risk; and short sale risk. ETFs that invest in companies with small capitalizations are subject to elevated risks, which include, among others, greater volatility, lower trading volume and less liquidity than larger companies. Please see the prospectus of each Fund for more complete information regarding each Fund’s specific risks.

To receive a distribution, you must have been a registered shareholder of the relevant VanEck ETFs on the record date. Distributions are paid to shareholders on the payment date. Past distributions are not indicative of future distributions.

Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at their NAV only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called “creation units” and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market. You will incur brokerage expenses when trading Fund shares in the secondary market.

Investing involves substantial risk and high volatility, including possible loss of principal. Bonds and bond funds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. An investor should consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of a Fund carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus and summary prospectus, which contains this and other information, call 800.826.2333 or visit vaneck.com. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing.

© Van Eck Securities Corporation, Distributor, a wholly owned subsidiary of Van Eck Associates Corporation

666 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017

800.826.2333

Email: [email protected]

Media Contact

Chris Sullivan

Craft & Capital

[email protected]

KEYWORDS: New York United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Asset Management Professional Services Finance

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

SLM INVESTOR ALERT: SLM Corporation a/k/a Sallie Mae Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead the SLM Class Action Lawsuit – RGRD Law

SAN DIEGO, Dec. 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that the SLM class action lawsuit seeks to represent investors in SLM Corporation a/k/a Sallie Mae (NASDAQ: SLM; SLMBP) securities between July 25, 2025 and August 14, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Captioned Zappia v. SLM Corporation a/k/a Sallie Mae, No. 25-cv-18834 (D.N.J.), the SLM class action lawsuit charges SLM and certain of SLM’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the

SLM

class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:


https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-slm-corporation-a-k-a-sallie-mae-class-action-lawsuit-slm-slmbp.html

You can also contact attorneys

J.C. Sanchez

or

Jennifer N. Caringal

of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at

[email protected]

.

CASE ALLEGATIONS: SLM, through its subsidiaries, originates and services private education loans (“PELs”).

The SLM class action lawsuit alleges that throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) SLM was experiencing a significant increase in early stage delinquencies; and (ii) accordingly, defendants overstated the effectiveness of SLM’s loss mitigation and/or loan modification programs, as well as the overall stability of SLM’s PEL delinquency rates.

The SLM investor class action further alleges that on August 14, 2025, investment bank TD Cowen issued a report addressing SLM, flagging that, “[o]verall, July [2025] delinquencies were up 49 bp m/m, higher (worse) than the seasonal (+10 bps) performance for July, driven by a 45 bps increase in early stage delinquencies.” Notably, TD Cowen’s findings directly contradicted assurances made by SLM’s CFO, defendant Peter M. Graham – made late in the month of July 2025 – that defendants were observing delinquency rates that “really are following the normal seasonal trends we would expect in the business,” the complaint alleges. Following this news, the price of SLM’s stock fell by approximately 8%, the SLM shareholder class action claims.

THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who invested in SLM securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the SLM class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the SLM investor class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the SLM shareholder class action lawsuit. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the SLM class action lawsuit.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world’s leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs’ firms in the world, and the Firm’s attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:


https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Attorney advertising. 
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. 
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. 

Contact:
        Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
        J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal
        655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101
        800-449-4900
        [email protected]



Gainey McKenna & Egleston Announces A Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against Coupang, Inc. (CPNG)

NEW YORK, Dec. 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Coupang, Inc. (“Coupang” or the “Company”) (NYSE: CPNG) securities between August 6, 2025 and December 16, 2025.

The Complaint alleges that Coupang had inadequate cybersecurity protocols that allowed a former employee to access sensitive customer information for nearly six months without being detected. The Complaint further alleges that this subjected Coupang to a materially heightened risk of regulatory and legal scrutiny. The Complaint also alleges that when defendants became aware that Coupang had been subjected to this data breach, they did not report it in a current report filing to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in compliance with applicable reporting rules. Additionally, the Complaint also alleges that as a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares of Coupang should contact the Firm prior to the February 17, 2026 lead plaintiff motion deadline. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].

Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.



Gainey McKenna & Egleston Announces A Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against F5, Inc. (FFIV)

NEW YORK, Dec. 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired F5, Inc. (“F5” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FFIV) securities between October 28, 2024, and October 27, 2025.

The Complaint alleges that Defendants provided investors with material information concerning F5’s cybersecurity capabilities and effectiveness. The Complaint alleges that the Defendants’ statements included, among other things, their confidence in the Company’s security coverage and that Defendants routinely emphasized the importance of effective security measures to F5’s clientele. The Complaint further alleges that Defendants’ statements included, among other things, confidence in the Company’s ability to uniquely address newly developing security concerns, provide best-in-class security offerings, and overall protect its clients’ data while capitalizing on the market potential for enhanced security offerings.

The Complaint also alleges that Defendants provided these overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of F5’s security capabilities; notably, that it was not truly equipped to safely secure data for its clients as F5 itself was, for all relevant times, experiencing a significant security breach (the “Security Breach”) of some of its key offerings and, further, that the revelation of this breach would significantly impact F5’s potential to access capital. The Complaint further alleges that the alleged false statements caused Plaintiff and other shareholders to purchase F5’s securities at artificially inflated prices.

Additionally, the Complaint alleges that investors began to question the truth of Defendants’ public statements on October 15, 2025, following a press release and associated 8-K. In pertinent part, the Complaint alleges that the Defendants announced a “long-term, persistent” breach to its systems, during which the Company’s BIG-IP product development and engineering knowledge management platforms were compromised, including the BIG-IP source code.

Further, the Complaint alleges that investors and analysts reacted immediately to F5’s revelation, with the price of F5’s common stock declining from a closing market price of $343.17 per share on October 14, 2025 to $295.35 per share on October 16, 2025, a decline of about 13.9% in the span of just two days.

The Complaint additionally alleges that notwithstanding the October 15 disclosures, F5 and the Defendants continued to mislead investors about the Company’s updated financial projections, a potential scope of client exposure, or the cost or significance of the remedial measures underway, planned, or otherwise contemplated.

The Complaint further alleges, that the full truth finally emerged on October 27, 2025 when F5 announced their fourth quarter fiscal year 2025 results and provided significantly below-market growth expectations for fiscal 2026. The Complaint alleges this was due in significant part to the Security Breach as the Company announced expected reductions to sales and renewals, elongated sales cycles, terminated projections, and increased expenses attributed to ongoing remediation efforts. The Complaint also alleges that Defendants disclosed that BIG-IP, the product that was the subject of the Security Breach, is the company’s highest revenue product. The Complaint alleges this highlighted the impact of the Security Breach on the Company because F5 does not otherwise provide revenue contributions by product line.

The Complaint also alleged that investors and analysts again reacted promptly to F5’s revelations, with the price of F5’s common stock declining from a closing market price of $290.41 per share on October 27, 2025 to $258.76 per share on October 28, 2025, a decline of an additional 10.9% in the span of two days.

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares of F5 should contact the Firm prior to the February 17, 2026 lead plaintiff motion deadline. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].

Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.



Ero Files Technical Report for the Xavantina Operations

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Dec. 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ero Copper Corp. (TSX: ERO, NYSE: ERO) (“Ero” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the filing of its Technical Report for the Xavantina Operations related to the update on its National Instrument 43-101 compliant mineral reserve and resource estimate previously announced on November 4, 2025.

The Technical Report was prepared in accordance with the Canadian Securities Administrator’s National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and can be found on the Company’s website (www.ero.com) and on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca). A copy of the Technical Report will also be filed on EDGAR (www.sec.gov).

ABOUT ERO

Ero is a Brazil-focused, growth-oriented mining company with a diversified portfolio of copper and gold assets. Headquartered in Vancouver, B.C., the Company operates two copper mines – the Caraíba Operations in Bahia State and the Tucumã Operation in Pará State – as well as the Xavantina Operations, a producing gold mine in Mato Grosso State. In addition to its operating assets, Ero is advancing the Furnas Copper-Gold Project, located in the mineral-rich Carajás Province in Pará State, through a definitive earn-in agreement with Vale Base Metals to acquire a 60% interest in the project.

Ero’s operating philosophy is grounded in a commitment to safety, operational excellence, and the responsible production of minerals essential for a better tomorrow. The Company’s shares are publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ERO.” Additional information, including technical reports on the Company’s operations and projects, is available on the Company’s website (www.ero.com), SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca), and on EDGAR (www.sec.gov).

FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT

Farooq Hamed, VP, Investor Relations
[email protected]

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION AND STATEMENTS

This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include statements that use forward-looking terminology such as “may”, “could”, “would”, “will”, “should”, “intend”, “target”, “plan”, “expect”, “budget”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “schedule”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “continue”, “potential”, “view” or the negative or grammatical variation thereof or other variations thereof or comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future filing of the Technical Report.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results, actions, events, conditions, performance or achievements to materially differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, risks discussed in this press release and in the Company’s most recent Annual Information Form (“AIF”) under the heading “Risk Factors”. The risks discussed in this press release and in the AIF are not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results, actions, events, conditions, performance or achievements to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results, actions, events, conditions, performance or achievements to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended.

Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and the Company’s actual results, achievements or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to herein and in the AIF under the heading “Risk Factors”.

The Company’s forward-looking statements are based on the assumptions, beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, many of which may be difficult to predict and beyond the Company’s control. In connection with the forward-looking statements contained in this press release and in the AIF, the Company has made certain assumptions about, among other things: favourable equity and debt capital markets; the ability to raise any necessary additional capital on reasonable terms to advance the production, development and exploration of the Company’s properties and assets; future prices of copper, gold and other metal prices; the timing and results of exploration and drilling programs; the accuracy of any mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates; the geology of the Caraíba Operations, the Xavantina Operations, the Tucumã Operation and the Furnas Copper-Gold Project being as described in the respective technical report for each property; production costs; the accuracy of budgeted exploration, development and construction costs and expenditures; the price of other commodities such as fuel; future currency exchange rates, interest rates and tariff rates; operating conditions being favourable such that the Company is able to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner; work force continuing to remain healthy in the face of prevailing epidemics, pandemics or other health risks, political and regulatory stability; the receipt of governmental, regulatory and third party approvals, licenses and permits on favourable terms; obtaining required renewals for existing approvals, licenses and permits on favourable terms; requirements under applicable laws; sustained labour stability; stability in financial and capital goods markets; availability of equipment; positive relations with local groups and the Company’s ability to meet its obligations under its agreements with such groups; and satisfying the terms and conditions of the Company’s current loan arrangements. Although the Company believes that the assumptions inherent in forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date of this press release, these assumptions are subject to significant business, social, economic, political, regulatory, competitive and other risks and uncertainties, contingencies and other factors that could cause actual actions, events, conditions, results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The Company cautions that the foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive. Other events or circumstances could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated or projected and expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements contained in this press release. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this press release and the Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise, except as and to the extent required by applicable securities laws.



RBLX ALERT: Investigation Launched into Roblox Corporation, RGRD Law Attorneys Encourage Investors and Potential Witnesses to Contact Law Firm

SAN DIEGO, Dec. 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is investigating potential violations of U.S. federal securities laws involving Roblox Corporation (NYSE: RBLX).

If you have information that could assist in the Roblox investigation or if you are a Roblox investor who suffered a loss and would like to learn more, you can provide your information here:


https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-roblox-corporation-investigation-rblx.html

You can also contact attorneys

J.C. Sanchez

or

Jennifer N. Caringal

of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at

[email protected]

.

THE COMPANY: Roblox is a gaming and creation platform.

THE INVESTIGATION: Robbins Geller is investigating whether Roblox and certain of its top executives made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or omitted material information regarding Roblox’s business and operations.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world’s leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs’ firms in the world, and the Firm’s attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:


https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. 
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. 

Contact:
        Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
        J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal
        655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101
        800-449-4900
        [email protected]