CAPR Court News: Capricor Therapeutics Securities Fraud Class Action Filed After Clinical Data Issues and 64% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law Before September 28

Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. has been sued for securities fraud over alleged misstatements about Deramiocel and the integrity of the clinical data supporting its Biologics License Application leading to a 64% stock drop.

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CAPR) and certain of the company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in Capricor Therapeutics securities, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/capricor-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the Capricor Therapeutics ($CAPR) Class Action:

  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 28, 2026
  • Lawsuit Allegations: Securities fraud alleging Capricor made false statements concerning Deramiocel and the integrity of the clinical data supporting its Biologics License Application.
  • Largest Alleged Stock Drop: July 27, 2026 – 64.5% Stock Drop
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Investors have until September 28, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Capricor securities. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. It is captioned Nkamga v. Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. et al., No. 26-cv-04385.

Why is Capricor Being Sued for Securities Fraud?

Capricor is a biotechnology company focused on developing cell and exosome-based therapeutics for rare diseases. Its lead product candidate, Deramiocel, is an investigational cell therapy being developed for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

According to the complaint, Capricor submitted a Biologics License Application to the FDA for Deramiocel in late 2024. In July 2025, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter stating that the application did not meet the statutory requirement for substantial evidence of effectiveness and that additional clinical data was needed.

As alleged, Capricor failed to disclose that it adopted changes to the pre-specified statistical analysis plan used to analyze clinical data for Deramiocel and that the FDA had not agreed to those changes before Capricor resubmitted the Deramiocel BLA.

Why did Capricor’s Stock Drop?

On July 27, 2026, the FDA released briefing documents ahead of an advisory committee meeting concerning Deramiocel. The FDA briefing documents reportedly raised concerns about post-hoc changes to Capricor’s statistical analysis plan, including changes to the methodology for calculating the primary endpoint, PUL 2.0, shortly before the database was unlocked and unblinded. This news caused the price of Capricor stock to decline $12.70 per share, or 64.5%, from a closing price of $19.70 per share on July 24, 2026, to $7.00 per share on July 27, 2026, the following trading day.

On July 29, 2026, the FDA advisory committee met to discuss the Deramiocel BLA. The next day, a medical news website named Medscape reported that in a non-binding 9-3 vote, the panel concluded that available evidence did not support the efficacy of Deramiocel for treating DMD-associated cardiomyopathy. On this news, Capricor’s stock dropped $2.38 per share, or 36%, from a closing price of $6.57 per share on July 29, 2026, to $4.19 per share on July 30, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/capricor-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in Capricor Therapeutics securities, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/capricor-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:

Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.”

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/capricor-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



GTM Court News: ZoomInfo Securities Fraud Class Action Filed After AI Integration Issues and 33% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law Before August 24

A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of ZoomInfo investors after its stock plummeted nearly 33% because ZoomInfo allegedly misled investors regarding its customer retention.

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GTM) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in ZoomInfo, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zoominfo-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the ZoomInfo ($GTM) Class Action:

  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 24, 2026
  • Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud alleging that ZoomInfo misled investors regarding the impact of ZoomInfo’s AI-integrated products on customer retention
  • Stock Drop: May 12, 2026 – 33% Stock Drop
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Investors have until August 24, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in ZoomInfo securities. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. It is captioned Tejeda v. ZoomInfo Technologies et al., No. 26-cv-05696.

Why is ZoomInfo Being Sued for Securities Fraud?

ZoomInfo has been sued for securities fraud following a significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws. The decline in ZoomInfo’s stock price caused significant losses to investors.

ZoomInfo provides go-to-market (“GTM”) intelligence and a customer engagement platform for sales, marketing, operations, and recruiting professionals.

Throughout the relevant period, ZoomInfo allegedly stated that “the demand for AI for GTM is evident up and down our customer stack.” According to ZoomInfo, its “innovative go-to-market AI” was “driving stronger daily engagement from a diverse set of go-to-market personas.”

On February 9, 2026, ZoomInfo issued its 2026 revenue guidance “in the range of $1.247 billion to $1.267 billion,” because “in 2026, our focus is on bringing” ZoomInfo’s “all-in-one AI platform for go-to-market teams . . . to our customers at scale.”

As alleged, ZoomInfo’s customer retention declined as customers were rejecting ZoomInfo’s AI products.

Why did ZoomInfo’s Stock Drop?

On May 11, 2026, ZoomInfo announced its Q1 2026 results and slashed its 2026 revenue guidance from $1.247-$1.267 billion to $1.185-$1.205 billion. ZoomInfo revealed that its customer growth “regressed” due to “AI and agentic confusion” leading to “a pause in [customers’] purchasing decisions[.]”

This news caused the price of ZoomInfo stock to decline $1.98 per share, or 32.78%, from a closing price of $6.04 per share on May 11, 2026, to $4.06 per share on May 12, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zoominfo-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in ZoomInfo, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zoominfo-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:
Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.”  One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.”

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zoominfo-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



BTU Court News: Peabody Securities Fraud Class Action Filed After Centurion Mine Issues and 10% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law Before August 24

A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Peabody investors after its stock plummeted over 9% because Peabody allegedly misled investors regarding the coal production at Centurion, its flagship premium hard coking coal mine.

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Peabody Energy Corporation (NYSE:BTU) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in Peabody, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/peabody-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the Peabody ($BTU) Class Action:

  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 24, 2026
  • Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud relating to Peabody’s statements about the coal production at Centurion, its flagship premium hard coking coal mine.
  • Largest Alleged Stock Drop: March 30, 2026 – 9.7% stock drop
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Investors have until August 24, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Peabody common stock. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. It is captioned McGeachy v. Peabody, et al., No. 26-cv-01020.

Why is Peabody Being Sued for Securities Fraud?

Peabody is a producer of metallurgic and thermal coal that owns interests in 16 active coal mining operations in the United States and Australia.

According to the complaint, during the relevant period, Peabody announced it would be increasing production from its flagship premium hard coking coal mine, Centurion due to an acceleration of longwall operations. Peabody stated that shipments of Centurion’s premium hard coking coal would expand sevenfold in 2026 to 3.5 million tons and even more beyond that time. On February 5, 2026, Peabody indicated that the team was “putting the finishing touches on the Centurion mine in advance of starting longwall mining, well ahead of its original schedule.”

As alleged, in truth, the Centurion mine was facing significant commissioning challenges resulting in increased costs and volume decreases in its production.

Why did Peabody’s Stock Drop?

On March 30, 2026, Peabody announced lower sales volume from the Centurion mine due to a delivery of only 250,000 tons in the first quarter. Peabody attributed the low volume to “greater than anticipated mine commissioning challenges.”

This news caused the price of Peabody common stock to drop $3.82 per share, or 9.7%, from $39.50 per share on March 27, 2026, to $35.68 per share on March 30, 2026.

Then, on May 5, 2026, Peabody announced additional delays to the commissioning of the Centurion mine as well as increased costs and lower volume. Peabody stated it only expected to sell about 300,000 tons in the second quarter and reduced its full year sales outlook for Centurion from 3.5 million tons to 2.5 million tons.

This news caused the price of Peabody common stock to drop $1.52 per share, or 5.7%, from $26.52 per share on May 4, 2026, to $25.00 per share on May 5, 2025.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/peabody-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in Peabody, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/peabody-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:

Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.”

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/peabody-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



HUBG Court News: Hub Group Securities Fraud Class Action Filed After Financial Restatements and 18% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law Before August 28

BFA Law has filed a securities fraud class action lawsuit on behalf of Hub Group investors after its stock plummeted 18% after it announced its financial statements were materially misstated and should no longer be relied upon

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Hub Group Inc. (NASDAQ:HUBG) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in Hub Group, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/hub-group-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the HUBG ($HUBG) Class Action:

  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 28, 2026
  • Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud relating to Hub Group’s financial results, revenue recognition, accounting of costs, internal controls, and prospects for/drivers of growth
  • Largest Stock Drop: February 6, 2026 – 18% Stock Drop
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
  • Filing Law Firm: Bleichmar Fonti & Auld (“BFA Law”)
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Investors have until August 28, 2026, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Hub Group securities. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. It is captioned Lawler v. Hub Group, Inc., No. 1:26-cv-07596.

Why is Hub Group Being Sued for Securities Fraud?

Hub Group is a transportation and logistics freight carrier that provides trucking and related services to operators across the supply chain. Hub Group services a customer base extending across various industries, including retail, consumer products, automotive, and durable goods, and reports to be one of the largest freight transportation providers in North America. 

The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements concerning the premature and incorrect revenue recognition of certain transactions, the understatement of purchased transportation costs and accounts payable, the effectiveness of internal controls, and the Hub Group’s drivers of financial results and growth.

Why did Hub Group’s Stock Drop?

On February 5, 2026, Hub Group announced that the Company’s financial statements for the first three quarters of 2025 should not be relied upon and would be restated due to “an error that resulted in the understatement of purchased transportation costs and accounts payable in the first nine months of 2025.” Hub Group revealed that its reports for those quarters “were in each case materially misstated due to the aforementioned error and should no longer be relied upon” and that “the Company [wa]s also continuing to assess the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and appropriate remediation steps.”  Hub Group also estimated that “[t]he total amount of the reduction to accounts payable and purchased transportation costs related to this issue that was recorded during these periods is $77 million.”  

This news caused the price of Hub Group stock to decline roughly 18%, from $51.33 per share at close on February 5, 2026, to $41.96 per share at close on February 6, 2026.

On May 12, 2026, Hub Group announced that it had “identified certain transactions that were prematurely or incorrectly recognized or not adequately supported,” causing its 2023 and 2024 annual reports filed with the SEC to be “materially misstated,” such that they “should no longer be relied upon.”  Hub Group did not quantify the expected misstatement, although it “expect[ed] to conclude that it did not maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for each of the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.”

This news caused the price of Hub Group stock to decline a further 13%, from $41.86 per share at close on May 11, 2026, to $36.62 per share at close on May 12, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/hub-group-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in Hub Group, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/hub-group-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:
Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” 

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/hub-group-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



IBM Investigation News: IBM Securities Fraud Investigation Initiated After IBM Z Product Slowdown and 25% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law

BFA Law is investigating whether IBM committed securities fraud relating to misrepresentations about the pace of securing new business deals and the strength of its IBM Z product outlook.   

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces an investigation into International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) for potential securities fraud after its significant stock drop.

If you invested in IBM, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ibm-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the IBM ($IBM) Class Action Investigation:

  • Investigation Overview: Securities fraud relating to IBM’s misrepresentations about the pace of securing new business deals and the strength of its IBM Z product outlook  
  • Stock Decline: July 14, 2026 – 25% Stock Drop
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Why is IBM Being Investigated for Securities Fraud?

IBM is being investigated for securities fraud following a significant stock drop. The decline in IBM’s stock price caused significant losses to investors.

IBM is a global technology and consulting company that focuses on hybrid cloud and artificial intelligence. IBM uses IBM Z to deliver enhanced AI acceleration through multi-model AI capabilities, low unit cost architecture at scale for workloads that require end-to-end encryption, continued availability, and ultra-high throughput.

BFA is investigating whether IBM misled investors about its pace securing new business deals and the strength of its IBM Z outlook.

Why did IBM’s Stock Drop?

On July 14, 2026, IBM released its 2026 Q2 financial results. IBM announced a disappointing quarter that it attributed to “a shortfall in our Z performance and the associated software stack, primarily in Transaction Processing.” IBM also revealed that it had “faltered,” and “did not adapt and move quickly enough” so that “numerous large deals failed to close on the timelines we expected, driving the majority of our shortfall.”

This news caused the price of IBM stock to decline over $75 in intraday trading on July 14, 2026, or over 25%.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ibm-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in IBM, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ibm-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:

Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.”

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ibm-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



EMBC Court News: Embecta Securities Fraud Class Action Filed After Insulin Pen Issues and 57% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law Before August 17

A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Embecta investors after its stock plummeted over 57% because Embecta allegedly misled investors regarding the strength of its insulin pen needle product category.

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Embecta Corp. (NASDAQ:EMBC) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in Embecta, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/embecta-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the Embecta ($EMBC) Class Action:

  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 17, 2026
  • Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud relating to Embecta’s statements about the strength of its insulin pen needle product category.
  • Largest Alleged Stock Drop: May 5, 2026 – 57.8% Stock Drop
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Investors have until August 17, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Embecta common stock. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. It is captioned Apitz-Grossman v. Embecta Corp., et al., No. 26-cv-07217.

Why is Embecta Being Sued for Securities Fraud?

Embecta is a medical device company that produces insulin pens for patients with diabetes. According to the complaint, during the relevant period, Embecta touted the strength of its insulin pen portfolio stating that “prescriptions for insulin pens have been showing a slight positive trend . . . just exemplifying the resilience of this product portfolio.”

As alleged, in truth, Embecta faced significant competition and “overall market softness for insulin pens and pen needles.”

Why did Embecta’s Stock Drop?

On May 5, 2026, Embecta announced disappointing Q2 2026 results that came in below guidance due to share loss within its pen needle product category, most of which was from a single customer. Embecta also reported an “overall market volume softness for insulin pens and pen needles in the retail channel,” admitting that “we have now begun to see a decline [for insulin pens] maybe more pronounced in the most recent quarter that we reported.” As a result, Embecta also reduced its quarterly dividend from $0.15 to $0.01 per share.

This news caused the price of Embecta common stock to decline $5.35 per share, or 57.8%, from $9.25 per share on May 4, 2026, to $3.90 per share on May 5, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/embecta-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in Embecta, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/embecta-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:
Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.”

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/embecta-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



PLNT Court News: Planet Fitness Securities Fraud Class Action Filed After Growth Issues and 31% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law Before September 14

A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Planet Fitness investors after its stock dropped over 31% relating to Planet Fitness’s failed marketing campaign that alienated the company’s core market, casual gym-goers, and led to disappointing membership growth during the key Q1 sign-up period.

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Planet Fitness, Inc. (NYSE:PLNT) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in Planet Fitness, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/planet-fitness-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the Planet Fitness ($PLNT) Class Action Lawsuit:

  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 14, 2026
  • Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud relating to Planet Fitness’s failed marketing campaign that led to disappointing membership growth during the key Q1 sign-up period
  • Stock Drop: May 7, 2026 – 31% Stock Drop
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire
  • Take Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Investors have until September 14, 2026, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Planet Fitness common stock. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. It is captioned Matsunaga v. Planet Fitness, Inc., et al., No. 26-cv-00576.

Why is Planet Fitness Being Sued for Securities Fraud?

Planet Fitness is a large franchisor and operator of fitness centers across the United States. The company aims to offer a fitness experience in a non-intimidating environment, which it calls the Judgement Free Zone. 

The complaint alleges that throughout the relevant period, Planet Fitness misrepresented the success of its marketing campaign to focus on “fitness-minded” members. For instance, Planet Fitness told investors that it “continue[d] to lean into our ‘we are all strong on this Planet’ campaign.” Planet Fitness also stated that “[b]ecause this campaign resonated so strongly last year, we extended it into 2026.”

In truth, Planet Fitness’s marketing campaign alienated fitness beginners and more casual gym-goers, which traditionally had been the company’s focus and would be forced to restructure its marketing strategy. This caused the company to halt planned increases which its sales projections were premised on.

Why did Planet Fitness’s Stock Drop?

On May 7, 2026, Planet Fitness released its Q1 2026 financial results. The company announced disappointing membership growth and cut 2026 revenue growth guidance from approximately 9% to about 7% and adjusted EBITDA growth guidance from roughly 10% to approximately 6%. During the same-day earnings call, the company stated that its marketing “may have pivoted too far” as the company “shift[ed] from [its] lighthearted approachable tone” to one that “increased penetration with the fitness-minded.” As such it announced that, “we are pausing the planned national Black Card price increase pending a broader pricing review.”

This news caused the price of Planet Fitness stock to decline $19.95 per share, or 31%, from a closing price of $63.96 per share on May 6, 2026, to $44.01 per share on May 7, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/planet-fitness-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in Planet Fitness, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/planet-fitness-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:

Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” 

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/planet-fitness-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



UTZ Investigation News: Utz Brands Investigation Initiated After $14.25 per share Acquisition Announced – Contact BFA Law if You Hold Shares

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that it is investigating the take-private merger of Utz Brands, Inc. (NYSE: UTZ), through which the founding Rice and Lissette family (through various entities) will own 50% of the post-merger company.

If you are a current shareholder of Utz Brands, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/utz-brands-investigation.

Key Details of the Utz Brands ($UTZ) Investigation:

  • Investigation Overview: Breaches of Fiduciary Duty in connection with Intersnack Group’s offer to acquire Utz Brands for $14.25 per share.
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Why is the Utz Brands Transaction being Investigated?

On July 21, 2026, Utz announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement under which Intersnack Group will acquire all Utz Class A Common Stock for $14.25 per share in cash. As a part of the merger, the Rice and Lissette family (as well as certain affiliates) have agreed to vote shares representing approximately 42% of Utz’ common stock in favor of the transaction.

After the merger, the Rice and Lissette family group will own 50% of the post-merger company, representing an approximate 8% gain in their collective ownership. Public shareholders, who are being asked to vote to approve the transaction, have not had the same opportunity to roll their shares into the post-merger entity.

BFA is investigating whether the negotiation or terms of the merger may represent a breach of fiduciary duty by any of Utz’ directors, or by the Rice and Lissette family as potential controllers of the corporation.

Click here for more information:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/utz-brands-investigation
  

What Can You Do?

If you are a current holder of Utz stock, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/utz-brands-investigation

Or contact:

Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” 

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/utz-brands-investigation

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



Vista Gold Appoints Gavin Ferguson as Managing Director, Vista Gold Australia

Vista Gold Appoints Gavin Ferguson as Managing Director, Vista Gold Australia

DENVER–(BUSINESS WIRE)–
Vista Gold Corp. (NYSE American and TSX: VGZ) is pleased to announce the appointment of Gavin Ferguson as Managing Director of Vista Gold Australia Pty Ltd., effective September 7, 2026. Mr. Ferguson will be based in the Company’s new West Perth office.

Mr. Ferguson is a highly accomplished executive who brings more than 35 years of international mining experience across mine development, project execution, operations, business transformation, and executive leadership. Most recently, he served as General Manager of the Carlin Mining Complex for Nevada Gold Mines, where he was accountable for five underground mines, three open pits and five processing facilities producing approximately 1.4 million ounces of gold annually. He led approximately 6,500 employees and contractors and was responsible for an annual operating budget of approximately $2.1 billion together with $300–$500 million in sustaining and growth capital.

Mr. Ferguson has held senior executive and operational leadership positions with Kinross Gold, K92 Mining, Teranga Gold, Newmont Mining, Anglo Platinum, Platinum Australia, and AngloGold Ashanti. His experience includes major operating turnarounds, mine restarts, greenfield and brownfield project development, feasibility studies, owner-operator transitions, major capital projects, and stakeholder engagement across multiple international jurisdictions. He has led teams and operated in a wide range of jurisdictional environments including South Africa, Australia, Papua New Guinea, Russia, West Africa, and North America.

Mr. Ferguson holds a Graduate Diploma in Mining Engineering from Curtin University, a Bachelor of Technology in Mining Engineering from the University of Johannesburg and has completed advanced management and leadership programs at the Saïd Business School, Oxford University. He is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM).

Frederick H. Earnest, President and CEO of Vista Gold, stated, “We are very pleased to welcome Gavin to Vista Gold. Gavin’s wide-ranging experience leading some of the world’s largest gold operations, together with his project development and turnaround experience, adds exceptional technical, operational and project execution capability to Vista Gold’s team. Gavin’s appointment underscores our commitment to building a strong Australia-based leadership team to advance Mt Todd. We are confident that he will play a vital leadership role in developing the project and creating long-term value for our shareholders.”

Gavin Ferguson, commented, “I am honored to join Vista Gold and lead the Australian project execution team at such an important stage in the advancement of Mt Todd.

“The 2025 Feasibility Study has established a compelling development proposition. The combination of a substantial gold reserve, long mine life, reduced initial capital requirement, and strong projected economics provides a strong foundation from which to advance the project.

“The opportunity now is to execute. I am committed to working with Vista’s Board and management teams to take the Mt Todd project from its current project stage through detailed engineering, development, and first gold. I also look forward to building strong relationships with the Northern Territory Government, Traditional Owners, local communities, contractors, and other stakeholders.”

About Vista Gold Corp.

Vista Gold holds the Mt Todd gold project, located in the Tier-1 mining jurisdiction of Northern Territory, Australia. Mt Todd is among the largest development-stage projects in Australia. The Company has defined a clear pathway to value realization, targeting the commencement of detailed engineering and design in 2027. This milestone is expected to initiate an approximately 27-month period of design, construction, and commissioning, culminating in first gold production.

Mt Todd offers strong project economics, significant initial production, and compelling expansion and exploration upside. Mt Todd benefits from advanced local infrastructure, options for future expansion, and broad community support, underpinning its potential to become a long-lived, globally significant gold operation.

For further information about Vista or Mt Todd, please contact Pamela Solly, Vice President of Investor Relations, at (720) 981-1185 or visit the Company’s website at www.vistagold.com.

Forward Looking Statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this news release that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. These forward-looking statements and forward-looking information include, but are not limited to statements regarding such things as the Company’s 2026 and 2027 objectives and priorities; the Company’s forecasts and expected cash flows; the Company’s projected capital and operating costs; the Company’s expectations regarding mining and metallurgical recoveries; the Company’s expectations of economic conditions and the price of gold; Mt Todd milestones and results; the Company’s belief that Mr. Ferguson’s experience adds exceptional technical, operational and project execution capability to the Company’s team; the Company’s belief that Mr. Ferguson will play a vital leadership role in developing the project and creating long-term value for the Company’s shareholders; the Company’s belief that the 2025 Feasibility Study has established a compelling development proposition and a strong foundation to advance the project; statements regarding relationships with the Northern Territory Government, Traditional Owners, local communities, contractors, and other stakeholders; the Company’s belief that Northern Territory, Australia is a Tier-1 mining jurisdiction; the Company’s belief that Mt Todd is among the largest development-stage projects in Australia; the Company’s belief that it has defined a clear pathway to value realization, targeting the commencement of detailed engineering and design in 2027; the Company’s belief that the Mt Todd project offers strong project economics, significant initial production, and compelling expansion and exploration upside; the Company’s belief that Mt Todd benefits from advanced local infrastructure, options for future expansion, and broad community support, underpinning its potential to become a long-lived, globally significant gold operation; the Company’s belief regarding execution dependencies, including the availability and terms of project financing, receipt and timing of required permits and approvals, detailed engineering outcomes, procurement and contractor/supply‑chain availability, construction execution, commissioning and ramp‑up performance, and final investment decisions execution dependencies; and statements related to the Company’s strategy. The material factors and assumptions used to develop the forward-looking statements and forward-looking information contained in this news release include the following: the Company’s forecasts and expected cash flows; the Company’s projected capital and operating costs; the Company’s expectations regarding mining and metallurgical recoveries; mine life and production rates; that laws or regulations impacting mine development or mining activities will remain consistent; the Company’s approved business plans, mineral resources and mineral reserves estimates and results of preliminary economic assessments; preliminary feasibility studies and feasibility studies on the Company’s projects, if any; the Company’s experience with regulators; political and social support of the mining industry in Australia; the Company’s experience and knowledge of the Australian mining industry; the Company’s expectations of economic conditions and the price of gold; and the factors noted above relating to financing, permitting, engineering, procurement, construction execution, commissioning and ramp-up, and final investment decisions. When used in this news release or elsewhere, the words “optimistic,” “potential,” “indicate,” “expect,” “intend,” “hopes,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “if,” “anticipate” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Such factors include, among others, uncertainty of resource and reserve estimates, uncertainty as to the Company’s future capital costs, operating costs, non-operating costs, and ability to raise capital; risks relating to cost increases for capital and operating costs; risks of shortages and fluctuating costs of equipment or supplies; risks relating to fluctuations in the price of gold; the inherently hazardous nature of mining-related activities; potential effects on the Company’s operations of environmental regulations in the countries in which it operates; risks due to legal proceedings; risks relating to political and economic instability in certain countries in which it operates; uncertainty as to the results of bulk metallurgical test work; and uncertainty as to completion of critical milestones for Mt Todd; as well as those factors discussed under the headings “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed in March 2026, and other documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian securities regulatory authorities. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements and forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements or forward-looking information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Pamela Solly

Vice President of Investor Relations

(720) 981-1185

KEYWORDS: Colorado Africa Australia/Oceania United States Canada North America Australia

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Mining/Minerals Natural Resources

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

RXT Court News: Rackspace Securities Fraud Class Action Filed After AI Effort Issues and 33% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law Before September 28

A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Rackspace investors after its stock plummeted 33.6% because Rackspace allegedly misled investors about its AI efforts and their impact on the company’s financial performance.

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Rackspace Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:RXT) and certain of the company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in Rackspace, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/rackspace-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the Rackspace ($RXT) Class Action:

  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 28, 2026
  • Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud alleging that Rackspace misled investors about its AI efforts and their impact on the company’s financial performance
  • Stock Drop: July 9, 2026 – 33.6% Stock Drop
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Investors have until September 28, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Rackspace securities. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is captioned Morgan-Reed v. Rackspace Technology, Inc., No. 26-cv-6491.

Why is Rackspace Being Sued for Securities Fraud?

Rackspace is a hybrid cloud and AI solutions company that operates physical infrastructure to host cloud services and artificial intelligence. The company also provides Rackspace AI, a portfolio of AI services to help organizations scale AI adoption.

During the relevant period, the company announced it signed a memorandum of understanding with Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”) to assist in building out its AI infrastructure and enhance its AI capabilities. That same day, the company reaffirmed its full year revenue guidance.

Rackspace told investors that the “AMD piece really fits into how” the company’s technology stack operates. Rackspace also stated that the AMD partnership “give[s] [the Company] confidence in the full year Private Cloud growth profile.”

As alleged, in truth, the company’s AI efforts would require Rackspace to significantly re-prioritize its capacity and pull capacity away from revenue generating segments.

Why did Rackspace’s Stock Drop?

On July 9, 2026, Rackspace revealed that its AI investments would require a significant re-prioritization of resources and a “transition away” from certain revenue generating segments. As a result, Rackspace revealed it was cutting its full year 2026 revenue guidance by $150 million and its full year Private Cloud revenue outlook by $25 million.

This news caused the price of Rackspace stock to decline $2.21 per share, or 33.6%, from a closing price of $6.58 per share on July 8, 2026, to $4.37 per share on July 9, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/rackspace-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in Rackspace, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/rackspace-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:
Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.”

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/rackspace-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.