Why Green Mobility Has to Go Beyond EV Sales

PR Newswire

IRVINE, Calif., July 1, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — For years, the conversation around electric vehicles has largely focused on one metric: How many cars are sold. While EV adoption remains an important indicator of progress, it tells only part of the story. The transition to sustainable transportation ultimately depends on something much broader – a connected mobility ecosystem where charging infrastructure, public transportation, shared mobility and digital innovation work together.

VinFast VF 8 and VF 9

Around the world, governments and automakers are recognizing that the future of transportation cannot be measured by vehicle sales alone. Consumers adopt an entire mobility experience. That experience is shaped by whether charging is readily available, whether public transit offers clean alternatives, whether smaller electric vehicles can solve urban transportation challenges, and whether new technologies can make driving safer and more accessible.

In other words, green mobility is fundamentally an infrastructure challenge as much as it is a vehicle technology challenge.

This systems-based approach is becoming increasingly relevant as cities grow denser, traffic congestion intensifies, and countries pursue climate goals. Electrifying transportation requires an ecosystem capable of supporting millions of daily journeys.

VinFast has embraced this broader vision from the outset. The company is building a comprehensive mobility ecosystem designed to expand access to sustainable transportation across multiple use cases and markets.

Green Mobility Is an Ecosystem

In the first quarter of 2026, VinFast delivered 58,577 electric vehicles worldwide, representing a 61% year-over-year increase, while international markets accounted for approximately 8% of total deliveries. In Vietnam, the company maintained its position as the country’s number one automotive OEM, while continuing to strengthen its presence internationally, ranking as the number one BEV brand in the Philippines, fourth in India, and eighth in Indonesia by the end of the first quarter. Yet one of the most telling indicators of VinFast’s ecosystem strategy extends beyond passenger vehicles. During the same quarter, the company delivered 143,136 electric scooters and e-bikes, an impressive 219% increase compared to the first quarter of 2025.

Different communities have different mobility needs. Dense urban centers often benefit from compact electric scooters and e-bikes that reduce congestion while improving affordability. Families may require larger electric SUVs for longer trips. Businesses increasingly seek commercial electric solutions, while cities need cleaner public transportation options to reduce emissions at scale.

No single product can solve every transportation challenge. A diverse ecosystem can.

Charging accessibility represents another critical pillar of that ecosystem. Even the most advanced electric vehicle cannot deliver its full value if charging remains inconvenient or difficult to access. Consumers consistently cite charging availability as one of the most important factors influencing EV adoption, making infrastructure just as important as battery technology itself.

Recognizing this, VinFast continues to expand its global retail and after-sales network, reaching 447 showrooms worldwide by the end of the first quarter of 2026. Beyond physical retail locations, the company has prioritized improving the ownership experience by ensuring customers have access to reliable service and convenient charging solutions.

Building the Infrastructure That Makes Sustainable Mobility Accessible

The U.S. market provides a compelling example of this customer-first approach. As one of the world’s most competitive automotive markets, the United States presents unique challenges.

VinFast’s U.S. strategy centers on accessibility. Competitive leasing programs significantly reduce the upfront cost of EV ownership, making electric mobility attainable for a broader range of consumers at a time when affordability has become increasingly important.

The company’s vehicle portfolio further reflects this philosophy. The VF 8 Eco, starting at an MSRP of $39,900, combines practical pricing with attractive customer incentives, including 0% APR financing for up to 84 months and retail bonus cash. The VF 8 Plus adds premium features while maintaining strong value, while the three-row VF 9 targets families seeking spacious electric transportation with premium design developed in collaboration with Pininfarina.

Technology also plays an important role in improving accessibility. The VF 9 incorporates an advanced suite of driver assistance technologies, including Highway Driving Assist, Automatic Lane Changing, On-Ramp and Off-Ramp Assist, Remote Parking, and Summon Mode, helping reduce driver workload while enhancing everyday convenience.

Equally important, VinFast reinforces long-term ownership confidence through an industry-leading 10-year or 125,000-mile vehicle warranty, while providing access to approximately 95% of public EV charging stations across the United States. Together, these advantages help address two of the most significant barriers to EV adoption, ownership cost and range anxiety.

Looking beyond today’s market, the future of green mobility will also depend on intelligent transportation technologies. Autonomous driving, connected vehicles, and AI-powered mobility systems have the potential to improve safety, optimize traffic flow, and make transportation more efficient for growing urban populations.

In June 2026, VinFast took another step toward that future by announcing a strategic collaboration with NVIDIA and Autobrains to develop a next-generation Level 4 autonomous driving program for Southeast Asia built on the NVIDIA DRIVE Hyperion platform. The initiative aims to make advanced autonomous driving technology more accessible while adapting it to the complex traffic conditions found across emerging markets.

Ultimately, the transition to cleaner transportation will not be won through vehicle sales alone. It will be shaped by the strength of the ecosystems surrounding those vehicles, the charging infrastructure that powers them, the mobility options that complement them, the digital technologies that enhance them, and the customer experiences that encourage widespread adoption.

Green mobility is not simply about replacing one car with another. It is about reimagining how people move. And the companies that succeed will be those building not just better electric vehicles, but better mobility systems.

VinFast

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/why-green-mobility-has-to-go-beyond-ev-sales-302815345.html

SOURCE VinFast

AngloGold Ashanti Publishes Notice of General Meeting in Relation to Proposed Share Repurchase Programme

AngloGold Ashanti Publishes Notice of General Meeting in Relation to Proposed Share Repurchase Programme

LONDON & DENVER & JOHANNESBURG–(BUSINESS WIRE)–
Shareholders of AngloGold Ashanti plc (“AngloGold Ashanti”, “AGA” or the “Company”) (NYSE: AU; JSE: ANG) are advised that the Company has today, Wednesday 1 July 2026, published its notice of meeting (the “Notice”) for a general meeting of its shareholders in relation to the proposed share repurchase programme (the “General Meeting”). The General Meeting is scheduled to be held at AGA’s global headquarters at 6363 S. Fiddlers Green Circle, Suite 1000, Greenwood Village, CO 80111, USA at 9:00 a.m. (MDT) on Thursday, 23 July 2026.

The Notice sets out the business proposed to be conducted at the General Meeting, with the record date set as Friday, 26 June 2026 for the purposes of determining eligibility to receive the Notice and to vote at the General Meeting. Mailing of the Notice to shareholders who have elected to receive paper communications will commence today. The Notice is also available online on the Company’s website at www.anglogoldashanti.com/generalmeeting and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

JSE Sponsor: The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited

Media

Andrea Maxey

+61 08 9425 4603 / +61 400 072 199

[email protected]

General inquiries

[email protected]

Investors

Andrea Maxey

+61 08 9425 4603 / +61 400 072 199

[email protected]

Yatish Chowthee

+27 11 637 6273 / +27 78 364 2080

[email protected]

Website: www.anglogoldashanti.com

KEYWORDS: South Africa Ireland Africa United States United Kingdom North America Europe Colorado

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Finance Natural Resources Professional Services Other Natural Resources Mining/Minerals

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

Costamare Inc. Declares Quarterly Dividend on Its Preferred and Common Stock

MONACO, July 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Costamare Inc. (the “Company”) (NYSE: CMRE) has declared cash dividends of US $0.476563 per share on its 7.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) (NYSE: CMRE PR B), US $0.531250 per share on its 8.50% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred Stock”) (NYSE: CMRE PR C) and US $0.546875 per share on its 8.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Stock”) (NYSE: CMRE PR D). The dividend for the Series B Preferred Stock, the Series C Preferred Stock and the Series D Preferred Stock is for the period from April 15, 2026 to July 14, 2026. The dividend will be paid on July 15, 2026 to all holders of record as of July 14, 2026 of Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock.

The Company has also declared a quarterly dividend on its common stock of US $0.125 per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. The dividend for the common stock is payable on August 6, 2026, to holders of record of common stock as of July 21, 2026.

The declaration of a dividend is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company, and accordingly will depend on, among other things, the Company’s earnings, financial condition and cash requirements and availability, the Company’s ability to obtain debt and equity financing on acceptable terms as contemplated by the Company’s growth strategy, the restrictive covenants in the Company’s existing and future debt instruments and global economic conditions.

About Costamare Inc.

Costamare Inc. is one of the world’s leading owners and providers of containerships for charter. The Company has 52 years of history in the international shipping industry and a fleet of 69 containerships in the water, with a total capacity of approximately 520,000 TEU. The Company also has 22 newbuild containerships under construction and has agreed to acquire two secondhand containerships with a total capacity of approximately 152,600 TEU. The Company also participates in a lease financing business. The Company’s common stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbols “CMRE”, “CMRE PR B”, “CMRE PR C” and “CMRE PR D”, respectively.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains “forward-looking statements”. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “believe”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “project”, “forecast”, “plan”, “potential”, “may”, “should”, “could” and “expect” and similar expressions. These statements are not historical facts but instead represent only the Company’s belief regarding future results, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside of the Company’s control. It is possible that actual results may differ, possibly materially, from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. For a discussion of some of the risks and important factors that could affect future results, see the discussion in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-34934) under the caption “Risk Factors”.

Company Contacts:

Gregory Zikos – Chief Financial Officer
Konstantinos Tsakalidis – Business Development, Investor Relations

Costamare Inc., Monaco
Tel: (+377) 93 25 09 40
Email: [email protected]



MSFT Lawsuit Notification: Microsoft Investors Bring Securities Class Action Following Functionality Issues – Contact BFA Law by August 11 Deadline

A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Microsoft investors after its stock plummeted 10% because Microsoft allegedly misled investors regarding its AI chatbot Copilot and cloud computing platform Azure

NEW YORK, July 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in Microsoft, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/microsoft-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the Microsoft ($MSFT) Class Action:

  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 11, 2026
  • Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud alleging that Microsoft misled investors regarding its Azure cloud computing platform and AI chatbot Copilot
  • Stock Drop: January 28, 2026 – 10% Stock Drop
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Investors have until August 11, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Microsoft common stock. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. It is captioned City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System, et al., No. 26-cv-02071.

Why is Microsoft Being Sued for Securities Fraud?

Microsoft is a multinational technology company that develops software, cloud services, and devices. In recent years, Microsoft’s cloud computing platform named Azure has been Microsoft’s main growth driver. A key reason for Azure’s recent growth is Microsoft’s multi-billion-dollar investment into AI, including the development of its own generative AI chatbot named Copilot.

According to the complaint, during the relevant period, Microsoft consistently touted Copilot’s best-in-class capabilities, which purportedly drove widespread and growing user adoption. Copilot’s apparent success allowed Microsoft to report surging Azure-related revenue.

As alleged, in truth, Copilot suffered from severe functionality issues that caused user adoption to decline and put Microsoft’s Azure revenue at risk.

Why did Microsoft’s Stock Drop?

On January 28, 2026, Microsoft announced disappointing 2Q 2026 financial results and that Azure growth had slowed suddenly. Microsoft also allegedly revealed for the first time that the number of Microsoft 365 Copilot premium customers totaled only 15 million, materially below analyst estimates.

This news caused the price of Microsoft common stock to decline $48.13 per share, or 10%, from $481.63 per share on January 28, 2026, to $433.50 per share on January 29, 2026.

Additionally, on February 3, 2026, The Wall Street Journal reported in an article titled “Microsoft’s Pivotal AI Product Is Running Into Big Problems” that severe challenges and functionality issues had plagued Copilot, causing the application to lose market share. Specifically, The Wall Street Journal reported that “[c]onfusing brand positioning and interoperability problems have frustrated users.”

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/microsoft-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in Microsoft, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/microsoft-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:
Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.”

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/microsoft-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



QXO Completes Acquisition of TopBuild

QXO Completes Acquisition of TopBuild

Deal Expected to Be Substantially Accretive to QXO’s Earnings

GREENWICH, Conn.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–
QXO, Inc. (NYSE: QXO) today announced it has closed its previously disclosed acquisition of TopBuild Corp. The transaction significantly expands QXO’s scale and capabilities across the building products value chain. QXO now holds leadership positions in key building product categories in North America:

  • #1 in insulation

  • #2 in roofing

  • #1 in waterproofing

  • #1 or #2 in the lumber and building materials sector, in key geographies served

The company also announced that Alec Covington, TopBuild’s former Chairman, joined QXO’s Board of Directors, effective immediately. Mr. Covington replaces Jared Kushner, who has resigned from the Board of Directors to focus on other commitments.

Brad Jacobs, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of QXO, said, “By acquiring TopBuild, we’re broadening our product offering, adding installation capabilities, and expanding our exposure to fast-growing end markets like data centers. By 2030, we expect to generate at least $300 million in annual synergies largely from procurement, pricing, and cross-selling, while applying TopBuild’s operational excellence across QXO. The transaction is expected to be highly accretive to earnings and advance our plan to build a world-class company with $50 billion in revenue. I’m grateful to Jared for his significant contributions to the company, and I’m pleased to welcome Alec to the Board.”

Under the terms of the merger agreement, former TopBuild shareholders will receive shares of QXO’s common stock or a combination of both cash and shares of QXO’s common stock based on their elections and subject to proration and the other terms and conditions in the merger agreement.

TopBuild’s shares will stop trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

Advisors

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC acted as lead financial advisor to QXO, and Barclays and Wells Fargo Securities acted as additional financial advisors to QXO. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP acted as legal counsel to QXO.

About QXO

QXO is North America’s largest distributor and installer of insulation; second-largest distributor of roofing products; second-largest publicly traded distributor of lumber and building materials; and largest distributor of waterproofing products. QXO is the fastest growing company in the $800 billion building products distribution industry and plans to become the tech-enabled leader by delivering best-in-class customer satisfaction and outsized returns for its shareholders. The company is targeting $50 billion in annual revenue within the next decade through accretive acquisitions and organic growth. Visit QXO.com for more information.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This communication contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about beliefs, expectations, targets or goals, the anticipated benefits of the acquisition and expected future financial position and results of operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on plans, estimates, expectations and/or goals at the time the statements are made, and readers should not place undue reliance on them. In some cases, readers can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “opportunity,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “target,” “goal,” or “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terms. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties and readers are cautioned that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described herein include, among others: (i) the risk that the anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; (ii) the effect of the acquisition on QXO’s business relationships with employees, customers or suppliers, operating results and business generally; (iii) unexpected costs, charges or expenses resulting from the acquisition; (iv) potential litigation and/or regulatory action relating to the acquisition; (v) the impact of legislative, regulatory, economic, competitive and technological changes; (vi) unknown liabilities and uncertainties regarding general economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, tax and geopolitical conditions; and (vii) those risks and uncertainties set forth in QXO’s and TopBuild’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including each company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and any subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Forward-looking statements should not be relied on as predictions of future events, and these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Forward-looking statements herein speak only as of the date each statement is made. QXO does not undertake any obligation to update any of these statements in light of new information or future events, except to the extent required by applicable law.

QXO Contacts:

Media

Joe Checkler

[email protected]

203-609-9650

Investors

Mark Manduca

[email protected]

203-321-3889

KEYWORDS: United States North America Connecticut

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Trucking Architecture Logistics/Supply Chain Management Other Construction & Property Transport Construction & Property Building Systems

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

GRAL Lawsuit Notification: GRAIL, Inc. Investors Bring Securities Class Action Following Trial Results – Contact BFA Law by August 4 Deadline

A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of GRAIL investors after its stock plummeted 50% because GRAIL allegedly misled investors relating to GRAIL’s NHS-Galleri cancer trial, potentially violating federal securities laws

NEW YORK, July 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against GRAIL, Inc. (NASDAQ:GRAL) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in GRAIL, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/grail-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the GRAIL ($GRAL) Class Action:

  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 4, 2026
  • Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud relating to GRAIL’s NHS-Galleri cancer trial
  • Stock Drop: February 20, 2026 – 50.55% Stock Drop
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Investors have until August 4, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in GRAIL common stock. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It is captioned Robbins v. GRAIL, Inc., et al., No. 26-cv-05428.

Why is GRAIL Being Sued for Securities Fraud?

GRAIL is a commercial-stage healthcare company focused on early cancer detection. GRAIL developed Galleri, a multi-cancer early detection test that analyzes blood samples to screen for multiple cancers, identify the likely organ or tissue of origin, and assist in the screening process. As part of GRAIL’s efforts to attain an accelerated implementation of its test as a national screening program through the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (“NHS”), GRAIL conducted the “NHS-Galleri trial.” The primary objective of the NHS-Galleri trial was “to show a reduction in late-stage (III-IV) cancers in people who received the Galleri test compared with those who did not.”

According to the complaint, during the relevant period, GRAIL made positive statements about Galleri, the NHS-Galleri trial design, and top-line results from the first screening round, including that the NHS-Galleri trial was “designed with three consecutive years of screening in order to achieve the primary endpoint,” and that “Galleri is working in the real world.”

As alleged, in truth, the NHS-Galleri trial’s three-year timeframe was insufficient to demonstrate the primary endpoint.

Why did GRAIL’s Stock Drop?

On February 19, 2026, GRAIL announced top-line results from its NHS-Galleri trial. Although the Company emphasized certain favorable results, GRAIL disclosed that the trial did not meet its primary endpoint. Specifically, GRAIL stated that the “primary endpoint of statistically significant Stage III-IV reduction was not observed.” GRAIL attributed the disappointing outcome, in part, to “probably need[ing] a longer follow-up time to be able to [compare the two arms of the study] adequately.”

This news caused the price of GRAIL stock to decline $51.32 per share, or 50.55%, from a closing price of $101.53 per share on February 19, 2026, to $50.21 per share on February 20, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/grail-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in GRAIL, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/grail-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:
Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” 

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/grail-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



ENSG Investigation Notification: Ensign is being Investigated for Securities Fraud Following Regulatory Issues – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money

BFA Law is investigating whether Ensign committed securities fraud by making false and misleading statements to investors regarding the quality of care at its nursing facilities, the sustainability of its growth and profit margins, and its regulatory compliance

NEW YORK, July 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces an investigation into The Ensign Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:ENSG) for potential securities fraud after significant stock drops.

If you invested in Ensign, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ensign-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the Ensign ($ENSG) Class Action Investigation:

  • Investigation Overview: Securities fraud relating to Ensign’s misrepresentations about care quality at the company’s nursing facilities, as well as Ensign’s growth, margins, and regulatory compliance
  • Stock Declines: June 8, 2026 – 8.2% Stock Drop; June 10, 2027 – 3% Stock Drop
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Why is Ensign Being Investigated for Securities Fraud?

Ensign is a healthcare services company that operates skilled nursing, senior living, and rehabilitative care facilities through a network of affiliated providers. Ensign relies heavily on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements, making government funding and regulatory compliance central to Ensign’s business model.

BFA is investigating whether Ensign misled investors about the quality of care at its facilities, as well as Ensign’s growth, margins, and regulatory compliance.

Why did Ensign’s Stock Drop?

On June 8, 2026, Hunterbrook Capital published a research report titled “Ensign: The Nursing Home Empire Built on Fatal Neglect” based on a five month investigation that alleged “Ensign’s profits can be traced to providing less care than its patients need – and less care than it is meant to provide based on the tax dollars it receives from the government.” According to Hunterbrook, Ensign padded its profit margin by understaffing its facilities while routing Medicare and Medicaid payments to affiliate entities owned or controlled by Ensign.

This news caused the price of Ensign stock to decline $13.88 per share, or 8.2%, from a closing price of $170.30 per share on June 5, 2026, to $156.42 per share on June 8, 2026.

On June 11, 2026, Muddy Waters Research published a research report titled “Ensign: Deceiving the Government at Estimated ~20% of Facilities” which alleged that Ensign “rents” required nursing-home administrator licenses from off-site administrators that do not actually oversee its facilities to create the appearance of regulatory compliance. According to Muddy Waters, genuine regulatory compliance would significantly reduce Ensign’s profitability.

On this news, the price of Ensign stock declined $4.52 per share, or 3%, from a closing price of $151.65 per share on June 10, 2026, to $147.13 per share on June 11, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ensign-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in Ensign, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ensign-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:

Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.”

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ensign-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



$TNC Investigation Notification: Tennant is being Investigated for Securities Fraud Following ERP System Issues – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money

BFA Law is investigating Tennant Company after its stock plummeted 23% due to issues with its ERP system, potentially violating federal securities laws.

NEW YORK, July 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces an investigation into Tennant Company (NYSE:TNC) for potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in Tennant, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/tennant-company-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the Tennant ($TNC) Class Action Investigation:

  • Investigation Overview: Securities fraud related to Tennant’s implementation and rollout of its new, company-wide enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system
  • Stock Decline: February 24, 2026 – 23.4% Stock Drop
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Why is Tennant Being Investigated for Securities Fraud?

Tennant manufactures industrial cleaning equipment, including large mechanical floor scrubbers and sweepers used in warehouses, retail stores, and other commercial facilities.

BFA is investigating whether Tennant made false and misleading statements to investors regarding the implementation and rollout of a large-scale ERP system. For instance, Tennant assured investors the project was “progressing as we’ve anticipated,” was “on time and on budget,” and that the launch of the ERP in its Asia-Pacific region had been “successful,” with Tennant stating it had “mitigated disruptions and stabilized operations.”

Why did Tennant’s Stock Drop?

On February 24, 2026, Tennant revealed that the rollout of its new ERP system in North America caused severe operational disruptions, including that it was unable to process and ship customer orders following the launch of the system. As a result, Tennant lost roughly $30 million in sales and would need to spend more than $20 million in 2026 to remediate the issues, compared to roughly $5 million the company had planned to spend.

This news caused the price of Tennant stock to drop $19.28 per share, more than 23%, from a closing price of $82.30 per share on February 23, 2026, to $63.02 per share on February 24, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/tennant-company-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in Tennant, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/tennant-company-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:
Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” 

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/tennant-company-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



$PLNT Investigation Notification: Planet Fitness is being Investigated for Securities Fraud Following Marketing Issues – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money

BFA Law is investigating whether Planet Fitness committed securities fraud relating to its marketing campaign that shifted from casual gym-goers to focus on more fitness-minded members leading to a stock drop of 31%

NEW YORK, July 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces an investigation into Planet Fitness, Inc. (NYSE:PLNT) for potential securities fraud after its significant stock drop.

If you invested in Planet Fitness, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/planet-fitness-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the Planet Fitness ($PLNT) Class Action Investigation:

  • Investigation Overview: Securities fraud regarding Planet Fitness’s failed marketing campaign that alienated the company’s core market and led to disappointing membership growth during the key Q1 sign-up period.
  • Stock Decline: May 7, 2026 – 31% Stock Drop
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Why is Planet Fitness Being Investigated for Securities Fraud?

Planet Fitness is a large franchisor and operator of fitness centers across the United States. The company aims to offer a fitness experience in a non-intimidating environment, which it calls the Judgement Free Zone. 

BFA is investigating whether Planet Fitness made false and misleading statements to investors regarding the purported success of its marketing campaign to focus on “fitness-minded” members.

Why did Planet Fitness’s Stock Drop?

On May 7, 2026, Planet Fitness released its Q1 2026 financial results. The company announced disappointing membership growth and cut 2026 revenue growth guidance from approximately 9% to about 7% and adjusted EBITDA growth guidance from roughly 10% to approximately 6%. During the same-day earnings call, the company stated that its marketing “may have pivoted too far” as the company “shift[ed] from [its] lighthearted approachable tone” to one that “increased penetration with the fitness-minded.”

This news caused the price of Planet Fitness stock to decline $19.95 per share, or 31%, from a closing price of $63.96 per share on May 6, 2026, to $44.01 per share on May 7, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/planet-fitness-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in Planet Fitness, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/planet-fitness-class-action-lawsuit

Or contact:

Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” 

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/planet-fitness-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



AVAV Lawsuit Notification: AeroVironment Investors Bring Securities Class Action Following SCAR Contract Cancellation – Contact BFA Law by July 27 Deadline

A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of AeroVironment investors after its stock plummeted over 17% because AeroVironment allegedly misled investors regarding its SCAR contract to provide the U.S. Space Force with its BADGER systems.

NEW YORK, July 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against AeroVironment, Inc. (NASDAQ:AVAV) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.

If you invested in AeroVironment, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/aerovironment-class-action-lawsuit.

Key Details of the AeroVironment ($AVAV) Class Action:

  • Lead Plaintiff Deadline: July 27, 2026
  • Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud relating to AeroVironment’s contract to provide the U.S. Space Force’s SCAR program with its BADGER phased array antenna systems
  • Largest Alleged Stock Drop: March 2, 2026 – 17% Stock Drop
  • Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
  • Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights

Investors have until July 27, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in AeroVironment securities. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. It is captioned Norrell v. AeroVironment, et al., No. 26-cv-01429.

Why is AeroVironment Being Sued for Securities Fraud?

In May 2025, AeroVironment acquired BlueHalo, LLC, a defense technology firm specializing in advanced engineering. Three years earlier, BlueHalo had been awarded a $1.4 billion contract to deliver its BADGER phased array antenna systems to support the U.S. Space Force’s SCAR program.

According to the complaint, during the relevant period, AeroVironment consistently touted its SCAR contract and indicated it represented a “tremendous growth opportunity,” that AeroVironment’s work pursuant to the contract was “very much on track,” that the customer was “asking for more [BADGER systems],” and that the Company stood “ready to build more.”

As alleged, in truth, AeroVironment faced a significant likelihood of competition for the SCAR program and overstated its goodwill from its BlueHalo acquisition.

BFA Law is also investigating AeroVironment’s June 22, 2026, announcement that the financial statements in its quarterly report for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2026 “require restatement and should no longer be relied upon.”

Why did AeroVironment’s Stock Drop?

On January 20, 2026, AeroVironment announced that the U.S. government issued a stop work order on the Company’s agreement to deliver BADGER systems to the SCAR program, upon mutual agreement with the Company. This news caused the price of AeroVironment common stock to decline $61.97 per share, or 15.77%, from $392.86 per share on January 16, 2026, to $330.89 per share on January 20, 2026.

On March 2, 2026, Space News reported that the U.S. Space Force was reopening the SCAR program to suppliers other than AeroVironment and “are going to move into a new acquisition strategy for SCAR” which would “likely take the form of other companies building versions or variants of SCAR.” On this news, AeroVironment’s common stock dropped $43.93 per share, or 17.42%, from $284.24 per share at open on March 2, 2026, to a close of $208.32 per share.

Then, on March 10, 2026, AeroVironment announced its Q3 financial results reporting an operating loss of $179.0 million, compared to an operating loss of $3.1 million for the same period in fiscal year 2025. The company also announced the impact of a $151.3 million goodwill impairment in the AeroVironment’s space division after the stop work order tied to the Space Force’s SCAR program. This news caused the price of AeroVironment common stock to drop $13.84 per share, or 6.24%, from $221.57 per share on March 10, 2026, to $207.73 per share on March 11, 2026.

Click here for more information:

https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/aerovironment-class-action-lawsuit

.

What Can You Do?

If you invested in AeroVironment, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses.

Submit your information by visiting:


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/aerovironment-class-action-lawsuit


Or contact:
Adam McCall
[email protected]
212.789.3619

Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP?

BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters.

Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.”

Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd.

For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com.


https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/aerovironment-class-action-lawsuit

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.