FibroBiologics Announces Pricing of $3 Million Public Offering

HOUSTON, March 31, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — FibroBiologics, Inc. (NASDAQ: FBLG) (“FibroBiologics” or the “Company”), a clinical-stage biotechnology company with 270+ patents issued and pending with a focus on the development of therapeutics and potential cures for chronic diseases using fibroblasts and fibroblast-derived materials, today announced the pricing of a best efforts public offering of an aggregate of 2,272,728 shares of its common stock (or common stock equivalents in lieu thereof) and warrants to purchase up to 2,272,728 shares of common stock (the “Warrants”), at a combined public offering price of $1.32 per share (or per common stock equivalent in lieu thereof) and accompanying Warrant. The Warrants will have an exercise price of $1.32 per share and will be exercisable beginning on the effective date of stockholder approval of the issuance of the shares upon exercise of the Warrants (the “Stockholder Approval”) and will expire on the five-year anniversary of the date of Stockholder Approval. The closing of the offering is expected to occur on or about April 2, 2026, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.

H.C. Wainwright & Co. is acting as the exclusive placement agent for the offering.

The aggregate gross proceeds to the Company from the offering are expected to be approximately $3 million, before deducting the placement agent’s fees and other offering expenses payable by the Company. The potential additional gross proceeds to the Company from the Warrants, if fully exercised on a cash basis, will be approximately $3 million. No assurance can be given that any of the Warrants will be exercised. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital and general corporate purposes.

The securities described above are being offered pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-294713), which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 31, 2026. The offering is being made only by means of a prospectus forming part of the effective registration statement relating to the offering. A preliminary prospectus relating to the offering has been filed with the SEC and is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and a final prospectus relating to the offering will be filed with the SEC. Electronic copies of the final prospectus, when available, may be obtained on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may also be obtained, when available, by contacting H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC at 430 Park Avenue, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10022, by phone at (212) 856-5711 or e-mail at [email protected].

This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the securities described herein, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or other jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to the registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or other jurisdiction.

About FibroBiologics, Inc.

Based in Houston, FibroBiologics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing a pipeline of treatments and seeking potential cures for chronic diseases using fibroblast cells and fibroblast-derived materials. FibroBiologics holds 270+ US and internationally issued patents/patents pending across various clinical pathways, including wound healing, multiple sclerosis, disc degeneration, psoriasis, orthopedics, human longevity, and cancer. FibroBiologics represents the next generation of medical advancement in cell therapy and tissue regeneration. For more information, visit www.FibroBiologics.com.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This communication contains “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the completion of the offering; the satisfaction of customary closing conditions related to the offering; the anticipated use of proceeds therefrom; the exercise of the Warrants prior to their expiration, and the receipt of Stockholder Approval. These forward-looking statements are based on FibroBiologics’ management’s current expectations, estimates, projections and beliefs, as well as a number of assumptions concerning future events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, conditions or results, and involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other important factors, many of which are outside FibroBiologics’ management’s control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, including those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in FibroBiologics’ annual, quarterly and current reports (i.e., Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K) as filed or furnished with the SEC and any subsequent public filings. Copies are available on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. These risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other important factors include, but are not limited to: (a) risks related to FibroBiologics’ liquidity and its ability to maintain capital resources sufficient to conduct its business; (b) the unpredictable relationship between R&D and preclinical results and clinical study results; (c) the ability of FibroBiologics to successfully prosecute its patent applications, (d) FibroBiologics’ ability to manufacture its product candidates; and (e) FibroBiologics’ ability to conduct clinical trials. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and FibroBiologics assumes no obligation and, except as required by law, does not intend to update, or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. FibroBiologics gives no assurance that it will achieve its expectations.

General Inquiries:
[email protected]

Investor Contact:

Nic Johnson
Russo Partners
(212) 845-4242
[email protected]

Media Contact:

Liz Phillips
Russo Partners
(347) 956-7697
[email protected]  



Service Properties Trust Announces Pricing of $500 Million Underwritten Public Offering of Common Shares

Service Properties Trust Announces Pricing of $500 Million Underwritten Public Offering of Common Shares

NEWTON, Mass.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Service Properties Trust (Nasdaq: SVC) today announced the pricing of its underwritten public offering of 416.7 million common shares of beneficial interest at a price to the public of $1.20 per share. The total gross proceeds to SVC are expected to be $500 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses payable by SVC. The settlement of this offering is expected to occur on or about April 2, 2026. The underwriters have also been granted a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 62.5 million common shares.

SVC expects to use the net proceeds of the offering, together with cash on hand, to redeem all or a portion of the $100.0 million principal amount outstanding of its 4.95% senior notes due 2027 and/or the $450.0 million principal amount outstanding of its 5.50% senior notes due 2027.

Yorkville Securities is acting as lead bookrunner and Jones is acting as bookrunning manager of the offering. B. Riley Securities, Oppenheimer & Co., Ladenburg Thalmann and Siebert are acting as co-managers of the offering.

The offering is being made pursuant to SVC’s effective shelf registration statement previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including the base prospectus therein. A preliminary prospectus supplement and accompanying base prospectus relating to the offering has been, and the final prospectus supplement, when available, will be, filed with the SEC, and copies may be obtained by contacting Yorkville Securities, LLC at [email protected] or JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC at [email protected] or by visiting the EDGAR database on the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov.

This press release is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of an offer to buy common shares, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which the offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such state or jurisdiction.

About Service Properties Trust

Service Properties Trust (Nasdaq: SVC) is a real estate investment trust with approximately $10 billion invested in two asset categories: service-focused retail net lease properties and hotels. As of December 31, 2025, SVC owned 760 service-focused retail net lease properties with over 13.6 million square feet throughout the United States. As of December 31, 2025, SVC also owned 94 hotels with over 21,000 guest rooms throughout the United States and in Puerto Rico and Canada. SVC is managed by The RMR Group (Nasdaq: RMR), a leading U.S. alternative asset management company with over $37 billion in assets under management as of December 31, 2025, and 40 years of institutional experience in buying, selling, financing and operating commercial real estate. SVC is headquartered in Newton, MA.

WARNING REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other securities laws. These forward-looking statements are based upon SVC’s present intent, beliefs and expectations, but these statements and the implications of these statements are not guaranteed to occur and may not occur for various reasons, some of which are beyond SVC’s control. For example:

  • This press release states that SVC expects the settlement of the common shares to occur on or about April 2, 2026. In fact, the issuance and delivery of the common shares is subject to various conditions and contingencies as are customary in underwriting agreements in the United States. If these conditions are not satisfied or the specified contingencies do not occur, this offering may not close.

  • This press release states that SVC expects to use the net proceeds from the offering, together with cash on hand, to redeem all or a portion of the $100.0 million principal amount outstanding of its 4.95% senior notes due 2027 and/or the $450.0 million principal amount outstanding of its 5.50% senior notes due 2027. However, the receipt and use of the proceeds is dependent on the completion of the offering and may not occur and the amount of net proceeds may not be sufficient to redeem all notes.

  • This press release states that the underwriters have been granted an option to purchase up to an additional 62.5 million common shares. An implication of this statement may be that this option may be exercised in whole or in part. In fact, SVC does not know whether the underwriters would exercise this option, or any part of it.

The information contained in SVC’s filings with the SEC, including under the caption “Risk Factors” in SVC’s periodic reports, or incorporated therein, identifies other important factors that could cause differences from SVC’s forward-looking statements. SVC’s filings with the SEC are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

You should not place undue reliance upon forward-looking statements.

Except as required by law, SVC does not intend to update or change any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

A Maryland Real Estate Investment Trust with transferable shares of beneficial interest listed on the Nasdaq.

No shareholder, Trustee or officer is personally liable for any act or obligation of the Trust.

Kevin Barry, Senior Director, Investor Relations

(617) 796-8232

KEYWORDS: Massachusetts United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: REIT Lodging Commercial Building & Real Estate Construction & Property Travel

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

EOSE Investor Alert: Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Allegedly Misleading Automated Production Claims: Levi & Korsinsky

EOSE Investor Alert: Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Allegedly Misleading Automated Production Claims: Levi & Korsinsky

Time-Sensitive: Allegations Focus on Automated Bipolar Production Quality Representations

“Investors deserve transparency about material risks that could affect their investments, particularly when a company’s public statements paint a picture of operational progress that allegedly diverges from manufacturing reality,” stated Joseph E. Levi, Esq., managing partner of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP.

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Levi & Korsinsky, LLP alerts investors in Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: EOSE) of a pending securities class action. Class Period: November 5, 2025 through February 26, 2026. Check if you can recover your investment losses or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] | (212) 363-7500.

EOSE shares lost $4.39 per share, a 39.4% single-day decline, closing at $6.74 on February 26, 2026, after the Company disclosed that its automated bipolar production failed to hit quality targets, driving rework and lost revenue. The deadline to apply for lead plaintiff appointment is May 5, 2026.

The Alleged Automated Bipolar Quality Deficiency

The lawsuit asserts that throughout the Class Period, management promoted a narrative of smooth automation progress at its Turtle Creek manufacturing facility. Public statements highlighted that 88% of bipolar lines were in commercial production and that subassembly automation was advancing as planned. What shareholders were not told, the action claims, was that automated bipolar production was failing to meet quality targets, generating significant rework that consumed production capacity and destroyed revenue.

Zinc Battery Manufacturing Quality Challenges in Automated Environments

The securities action focuses on how quality failures in an automated production environment compound differently than in manual or semi-automated settings:

  • Automated bipolar production lines that cannot hit quality targets generate defective output at scale, multiplying rework costs with every hour of operation
  • Rework from quality failures allegedly consumed production time that had been counted toward revenue guidance of $150 million to $160 million
  • As alleged, tightened material specifications and improved tooling were not implemented until after quality problems had already eroded revenue
  • Laser detection systems for process variation control were added only after the damage, suggesting the original quality monitoring was allegedly inadequate
  • The gap between the Company’s claimed automation progress and actual quality performance allegedly widened throughout Q4 2025
  • Actual full year revenue of $114.2 million fell $35.8 million to $45.8 million short of guidance, with quality-driven rework cited as a contributing factor

Why Automated Production Quality Allegedly Matters to Investors

The complaint contends that Eos Energy’s investment thesis rested on its ability to scale zinc-based battery production through automation. When management represented that its first fully automated manufacturing line was installed and in commercial production, investors reasonably understood that quality benchmarks were being met. The action claims this representation was materially misleading because automated bipolar production was not hitting quality targets, a fact that directly undermined the revenue ramp that justified the Company’s guidance and stock price.

Speak with an attorney about recovering damages or call (212) 363-7500.

WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY — Ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services’ Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP is a nationally recognized leader in shareholder rights litigation. With a team of over 70 professionals, the firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004
[email protected]
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171

KEYWORDS: New York United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Class Action Lawsuit Professional Services Legal

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

DRVN Investor Alert: Driven Brands Holdings Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After CFO Allegedly Signed Misstated Financials: Levi & Korsinsky

DRVN Investor Alert: Driven Brands Holdings Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After CFO Allegedly Signed Misstated Financials: Levi & Korsinsky

Executive Accountability: Michael F. Diamond Named in Securities Action

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors that Michael F. Diamond, Chief Financial Officer of Driven Brands Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DRVN), is named as an individual defendant in a securities class action filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased DRVN securities between May 9, 2023, and February 24, 2026. Find out if you can recover losses tied to executive misconduct or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] or (212) 363-7500.

Driven Brands shares plummeted nearly 40%, losing $6.62 per share, after the Company disclosed on February 25, 2026, that nearly three years of financial statements required restatement due to material errors spanning ten categories. The lead plaintiff deadline is May 8, 2026.

Michael F. Diamond’s Role During the Class Period

Diamond assumed the role of Chief Financial Officer on August 9, 2024, making him the Company’s top finance executive during a critical stretch of the Class Period. The action contends that Diamond bore direct responsibility for the accuracy of financial disclosures filed under his watch, including:

  • The Q3 2024 10-Q filed November 7, 2024, reporting approximately $592 million in quarterly net revenue and $249 million in cash balances now subject to restatement
  • The fiscal year 2024 10-K filed February 26, 2025, reporting $2.34 billion in annual net revenue and claiming a 2% year-over-year increase
  • The Q1 2025 10-Q filed May 8, 2025, reporting approximately $516.2 million in quarterly revenue

Diamond co-signed each of these filings alongside the Company’s CEO, the complaint identifies.

Diamond’s Expanded Accounting Oversight

Following the resignation of Chief Accounting Officer Michael Beland in January 2025, Diamond assumed the additional role of interim principal accounting officer. The pleading asserts that this dual responsibility placed Diamond at the center of both the Company’s financial reporting and its accounting controls during a period when an unreconciled cash balance originating in 2023 was allegedly causing revenue to be overstated and operating expenses to be understated across multiple reporting periods.

Diamond held the interim accounting role until Rebecca Fondell assumed that position in May 2025.

Diamond’s Certifications and Liability

As CFO, Diamond signed Sarbanes-Oxley certifications under Sections 302 and 906 attesting that the Company’s financial statements fairly presented its financial condition and that disclosure controls were effective. The securities action charges that these certifications were materially false given the ten categories of errors later identified by the Audit Committee.

As averred in the complaint, Diamond possessed the power and authority to control the content and form of the Company’s SEC filings, and had access to material non-public information regarding the true state of the Company’s financial reporting.

Section 20(a) Context for Michael F. Diamond

The action asserts claims under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, which holds controlling persons jointly and severally liable for primary violations of the securities laws. The complaint charges that Diamond, by virtue of his senior position, stock ownership, and participation in the preparation of the Company’s public filings, acted as a controlling person of Driven Brands.

“Individual officers who sign SEC certifications bear personal responsibility for the accuracy of corporate disclosures. When a company is forced to restate nearly three years of financial statements across ten error categories, questions about executive accountability are unavoidable.” — Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE: May 8, 2026

Submit your claim to join the Driven Brands recovery or call Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at (212) 363-7500.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, Top 50 securities litigation firm (ISS, seven consecutive years). Over 70 professionals. Hundreds of millions recovered for investors.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004
[email protected]
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171

KEYWORDS: New York United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Class Action Lawsuit Professional Services Legal

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

ODD Investor Alert: ODDITY Tech Ltd. Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Allegedly Fabricating Sustainable Growth Narrative: Levi & Korsinsky

ODD Investor Alert: ODDITY Tech Ltd. Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Allegedly Fabricating Sustainable Growth Narrative: Levi & Korsinsky

Promise vs. Reality: The ODDITY Tech Performance Gap

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–“Beat and raise.” For eight consecutive quarters after its IPO, ODDITY Tech Ltd. (NASDAQ: ODD) delivered those words to shareholders. Then, on February 25, 2026, the Company disclosed that its advertisements had been diverted to lower quality auctions at abnormally high costs, projecting a 30% year-over-year revenue decline for Q1 2026. Shares collapsed 49.21%, erasing $14.28 per share in a single session.

Find out if you can recover your investment losses or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] or (212) 363-7500.

A securities class action has been filed on behalf of purchasers of ODD securities between February 26, 2025 and February 24, 2026. The lead plaintiff deadline is May 11, 2026.

The Promise

Throughout the Class Period, the Company projected confidence and escalating strength to the investing public:

  • April 29, 2025: Management stated results “exceeded our expectations across all metrics” and raised full year outlook to net revenue of $790M-$798M with 22%-23% growth
  • August 4, 2025: Management touted “yet another beat and raise” and lifted revenue guidance to $799M-$804M with 23%-24% growth
  • November 19, 2025: Management reported results that “once again exceeded our guidance” and raised revenue outlook to $806M-$809M with 24%-25% growth
  • Each quarter featured claims of a “powerful financial model,” “multiple engines,” and a digital-first business positioned to “play full offense”

The Reality

The lawsuit contends that behind these projections, an algorithm change by the Company’s largest advertising partner was already diverting ads to lower quality auctions at abnormally high costs. On February 25, 2026, the Company disclosed this disruption and projected Q1 2026 revenue would decline approximately 30% year-over-year. When asked by an analyst when the issue actually started, the Company’s CFO acknowledged the Company had “observed that something was different in the second half of 2025.” ODD shares closed at $14.74, down from $29.02.

The Numbers: Promised vs. Actual

  • Promised: Sustained “high-growth and attractive margin profile” with an “agile business model”
  • Actual: A single advertising partner’s algorithm change triggered a projected 30% revenue decline
  • Promised: “High visibility backlog of repeat orders” providing confidence to raise outlook
  • Actual: New user acquisition costs surged to levels “not correlated with the market or historical experience”
  • Promised: Eight straight quarters of beat-and-raise results
  • Actual: A 49.21% single-day stock price collapse

What the Lawsuit Alleges About the Gap

The action claims the Company knew or recklessly disregarded that its core digital acquisition model was compromised during the second half of 2025 while continuing to raise guidance and project strength. Eight major banks, including Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Barclays, and Evercore ISI, downgraded ODD following the disclosure.

“Companies that make specific promises to investors about future performance have an obligation to disclose known risks to those projections. When a company raises guidance quarter after quarter while its primary customer acquisition channel is deteriorating, investors deserve to understand that contradiction.” — Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

Speak with an attorney about recovering your ODD investment losses or call (212) 363-7500.

LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE: May 11, 2026

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP is a nationally recognized shareholder rights firm. Over the past 20 years, the firm has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Ranked in ISS Top 50 for seven consecutive years.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004
[email protected]
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171

KEYWORDS: New York United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Class Action Lawsuit Professional Services Legal

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

ALIT Investor Alert: Alight, Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After CFO Allegedly Concealed Financial Shortfalls: Levi & Korsinsky

ALIT Investor Alert: Alight, Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After CFO Allegedly Concealed Financial Shortfalls: Levi & Korsinsky

Executive Accountability: Jeremy J. Heaton Named in Securities Action

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors that Jeremy J. Heaton, former Chief Financial Officer of Alight, Inc. (NYSE: ALIT), is named as an individual defendant in a securities class action filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The action covers purchases between November 12, 2024 and February 18, 2026. Find out if you are entitled to recover investment losses. You may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] or (212) 363-7500.

Alight shares lost approximately $6.85 per share over the Class Period, a decline of nearly 90%. The lead plaintiff deadline is May 15, 2026.

Jeremy J. Heaton’s Role During the Class Period

Defendant Heaton served as Alight’s CFO until his departure on January 9, 2026. As the Company’s principal financial officer, Heaton bore direct responsibility for Alight’s financial reporting, SEC filings, and public financial projections. The complaint identifies Heaton as a key architect of the financial outlook that the lawsuit contends was materially misleading.

During the Class Period, Heaton provided detailed quarterly and annual financial targets, including fiscal 2025 guidance of $2,318 million to $2,388 million in revenue, $620 million to $645 million in Adjusted EBITDA, and $250 million to $285 million in free cash flow. He also repeatedly emphasized the sustainability of the Company’s newly initiated quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share and a $200 million increase to share repurchase authorization.

What Heaton Allegedly Oversaw

The action claims that under Heaton’s financial stewardship, Alight’s public projections obscured deteriorating internal realities:

  • Heaton presented 89% of 2025 revenue as already under contract while the remaining pipeline and project revenue were weakening beyond what guidance reflected

  • He publicly characterized the Company’s view on project revenue as merely “cautious” when demand was declining more sharply than disclosed

  • He outlined a second-half growth ramp dependent on ARR bookings and project revenue that the Company allegedly lacked the commercial execution capability to deliver

  • He affirmed the dividend and expanded buyback authorization while the Company’s earnings trajectory allegedly could not sustain those capital return commitments

  • He departed the Company weeks after the November 2025 earnings call without any public acknowledgment of the execution failures later revealed by new management

Speak with an attorney about recovering your losses in this action or call (212) 363-7500.

Heaton’s Certifications and Liability

As CFO, Heaton signed Sarbanes-Oxley Sections 302 and 906 certifications attesting that Alight’s periodic reports filed with the SEC did not contain untrue statements of material fact and fairly presented the Company’s financial condition. The complaint charges that these certifications were false in light of the undisclosed execution shortfalls and the unsustainable dividend commitment.

Section 20(a) Context for Jeremy J. Heaton

The lawsuit asserts claims under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, which imposes liability on individuals who controlled the entity that committed the primary violation. As CFO, Heaton possessed the power and authority to control the content of Alight’s SEC filings, press releases, and investor presentations. The complaint alleges he had access to material non-public information regarding Alight’s deteriorating commercial execution and project revenue trajectory, and that he failed to disclose these adverse facts.

“Individual officers who sign SEC certifications bear personal responsibility for the accuracy of corporate disclosures. When a company’s financial outlook materially diverges from internal realities, the certifying officers face serious questions about what they knew and when they knew it.” — Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE: May 15, 2026

Submit your information to pursue recovery of your ALIT losses or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at (212) 363-7500.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, Top 50 securities litigation firm (ISS, seven consecutive years). Over 70 professionals. Hundreds of millions recovered for investors.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP

Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

Ed Korsinsky, Esq.

33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor

New York, NY 10004

[email protected]

Tel: (212) 363-7500

Fax: (212) 363-7171

KEYWORDS: New York United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Class Action Lawsuit Professional Services Legal

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

MNDY Investor Alert: monday.com Ltd. Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Allegedly Misleading Investors Over Time: Levi & Korsinsky

MNDY Investor Alert: monday.com Ltd. Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Allegedly Misleading Investors Over Time: Levi & Korsinsky

Key Dates and Disclosure Events Shareholders Need to Know

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Levi & Korsinsky, LLP encourages investors who suffered losses in monday.com Ltd. (NASDAQ: MNDY) to contact the firm. WHO IS AFFECTED: Those who purchased MNDY securities between September 17, 2025 and February 6, 2026 may be entitled to recover damages. Find out if you are eligible to recover losses or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] | (212) 363-7500.

MNDY shares lost over $111 per share from their Class Period high of $189.59 to $77.63 following the final corrective disclosure. The window to apply for lead plaintiff closes on May 11, 2026.

September 17, 2025: The $1.8 Billion Pledge

On this date, monday.com hosted its annual Analyst and Investor Day. The Company unveiled a fiscal year 2027 revenue target of approximately $1.8 billion. Management described the target as a baseline projection supported by continued enterprise expansion, increasing multi-product adoption, and growing use of the Company’s AI-enabled features. Executives pointed to platform engagement metrics – including approximately 67 million AI actions on the platform – along with roughly $768 million in remaining performance obligations and net dollar retention rates above 111% as evidence of predictable growth. The lawsuit contends these projections did not account for decelerating customer growth and lengthening sales cycles that were already developing at the time.

November 10, 2025: Softer Guidance Despite Earnings Beat

monday.com reported third quarter 2025 revenue of $316.9 million, beating consensus. Further, the Company issued fourth quarter guidance of $328 million to $330 million, representing 22% to 23% year-over-year growth. Management also reaffirmed its commitment to the $1.8 billion fiscal year 2027 target during the accompanying earnings call. Following the announcement, MNDY shares declined from $189.59 to $166.21.

February 9, 2026: The Target Disappears

monday.com reported fourth quarter and full year 2025 results alongside 2026 guidance of $1.452 billion to $1.462 billion, representing 18% to 19% growth. In the same release, the Company rescinded the $1.8 billion 2027 revenue target entirely, citing “the evolving nature of the AI landscape and the choppiness in the no-touch demand environment.” MNDY shares plunged 21%, closing at $77.63.

Chronology of Material Events

  • September 17, 2025: $1.8 billion fiscal year 2027 revenue target announced at Investor Day as a baseline projection, supported by AI traction and enterprise growth claims
  • November 10, 2025: Q3 2025 results beat consensus but Q4 guidance decelerated; management reaffirmed the $1.8 billion target repeatedly; stock fell 12.3%
  • February 9, 2026: Q4 and full year 2025 results released; 2027 revenue target rescinded; 2026 guidance set at $1.452 billion to $1.462 billion; stock fell 21%
  • Between these dates: The complaint alleges management knew or should have known that slower enterprise growth, extended sales cycles and reduced expansion momentum placed the $1.8 billion target at material risk

Submit your claim before the deadline or call (212) 363-7500.

“Timely disclosure of material developments is fundamental to fair and efficient markets. The sequence of events in this case raises questions about when the risks to monday.com’s long-term revenue target became apparent to management versus when they were communicated to shareholders.” — Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

Find out if you are eligible to recover losses or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at (212) 363-7500.

ABOUT THE FIRM — For over two decades, Levi & Korsinsky has represented shareholders in securities class actions. Ranked in ISS Top 50 for seven consecutive years. Those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by May 11, 2026.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004
[email protected]
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171

KEYWORDS: New York United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Class Action Lawsuit Professional Services Legal

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

PSIX Investor Alert: Power Solutions International Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Company Allegedly Concealed Margin Erosion: Levi & Korsinsky

PSIX Investor Alert: Power Solutions International Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Company Allegedly Concealed Margin Erosion: Levi & Korsinsky

Critical Information: $24.84 Per-Share Loss Quantifies Alleged Investor Damages

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–From a Class Period high of $85.75 on March 2, 2026, Power Solutions International, Inc. (NASDAQ: PSIX) shares collapsed to $60.91, a decline of $24.84 per share, or nearly 29%, in a single trading session on unusually heavy volume. Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors who purchased PSIX securities between May 8, 2025 and March 2, 2026 that a securities class action has been filed. Find out if you qualify to recover your per-share losses. You may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] or (212) 363-7500.

The lead plaintiff deadline is May 19, 2026. Gross margin deteriorated from 29.7% in Q1 2025 to 21.9% by Q4 2025, an 8-percentage-point erosion that the lawsuit contends was foreseeable and inadequately disclosed to shareholders.

How the Market Repriced PSIX After Concealed Risks Surfaced

The market’s repricing of PSIX shares occurred across two corrective events. On November 7, 2025, following Q3 results that revealed a 5.0% year-over-year gross margin decline and a downward revision of annual sales growth expectations to 45%, shares fell $15.55, or 19.14%, closing at $65.69 on heavy volume. This first correction removed a portion of the artificial inflation that the complaint alleges had been sustained by management’s repeated characterization of margin pressure as merely “temporary.”

The second and larger correction came on March 3, 2026, when Q4 results disclosed an 8% year-over-year gross margin collapse and an outlook limited to only “moderate margin improvement.” The filing states that the Company simultaneously revealed it was only now “executing specific actions to improve supply chain performance and manufacturing cost structures,” suggesting these problems had persisted far longer than investors were led to believe. Shares shed $24.84, or 28.97%, in a single session.

The Alleged Artificial Inflation and Its Removal

The lawsuit maintains that PSIX securities traded at artificially inflated prices throughout the Class Period because:

  • Management touted a pivot to “higher growth, higher-margin markets” while gross margins declined every consecutive quarter from 29.7% to 21.9%
  • The Company characterized production challenges as “temporary inefficiencies” through multiple quarterly reports, even as the problems worsened
  • Sales growth decelerated sharply from 74% (Q2) to 65% (Q3) to 33% (Q4), contradicting the narrative of accelerating data center demand
  • The full scope of supply chain failures and manufacturing cost structure problems was not disclosed until the final corrective event

Join the PSIX recovery action or call (212) 363-7500.

“When companies fail to disclose material information, shareholders may suffer significant losses. The magnitude of the market’s reaction to each corrective disclosure in this case suggests that investors were deprived of information material to their investment decisions,” — Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

ABOUT LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP — Over the past 20 years, Levi & Korsinsky has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. The firm has extensive expertise in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees. For seven consecutive years, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services’ Top 50 Report.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004
[email protected]
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171

KEYWORDS: New York United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Class Action Lawsuit Professional Services Legal

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

LU Investor Alert: Lufax Holding Ltd Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Executives Allegedly Falsified SOX Certifications: Levi & Korsinsky

LU Investor Alert: Lufax Holding Ltd Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Executives Allegedly Falsified SOX Certifications: Levi & Korsinsky

Important Information Regarding Section 20(a) Individual Liability Claims Against Lufax’s CEO and CFO

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Levi & Korsinsky, LLP alerts investors in Lufax Holding Ltd (NYSE: LU) of a pending securities class action naming two senior officers as individual defendants. Class Period: April 7, 2023 through January 26, 2025. Find out if you qualify to recover losses or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] | (212) 363-7500.

Lufax ADS holders lost $0.40 per share (13.8%) on the initial corrective disclosure, with cumulative declines pushing shares from $2.89 to $2.26 over three trading sessions. A re-audit confirmed net profit overstatements of RMB 917.0 million (2022) and RMB 81.4 million (2023). The Court has set May 20, 2026 as the deadline to apply for lead plaintiff appointment.

The Named Individual Defendants

The securities action identifies Yong Suk Cho, who served as Chief Executive Officer at all relevant times, and David Siu Kam Choy, who served as Chief Financial Officer until April 2024. Both officers directly participated in Company management and were involved in drafting, reviewing, and disseminating the allegedly false annual reports filed with the SEC.

Sarbanes-Oxley Certification Obligations

The complaint charges that both Cho and Choy signed SOX certifications attached to the 2022 and 2023 Annual Reports on Form 20-F. Those certifications attested to:

  • The accuracy of Lufax’s financial reporting for fiscal years 2022 and 2023
  • The effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
  • The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting under the COSO 2013 framework
  • The disclosure of any material changes to internal controls
  • The disclosure of all fraud involving management or employees with a significant role in internal controls

The action contends these certifications were materially false because Lufax’s internal controls were deficient, and the resulting financial statements overstated net profit by nearly RMB 1 billion across two fiscal years.

Section 20(a) Control Person Framework

The lawsuit asserts that Cho and Choy are liable as “controlling persons” under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As pleaded, both officers exercised power and authority over the contents of Lufax’s SEC filings, press releases, and public statements throughout the Class Period. Their positions gave them access to confidential information about the Company’s true financial condition, including the adequacy of internal controls and the existence of the Subject Transactions that PricewaterhouseCoopers later flagged.

Speak with an attorney about recovering damages or call (212) 363-7500.

“Corporate officers have a duty to ensure their companies’ public statements are accurate and complete. When SOX certifications attest to effective internal controls that are later found deficient, and when net profit is overstated by hundreds of millions of RMB, the officers who signed those certifications face serious questions about their liability.” — Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

Submit your information to join the recovery or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at (212) 363-7500.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP — Top 50 securities litigation firm (ISS, seven consecutive years). Over 70 professionals. Hundreds of millions recovered.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004
[email protected]
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171

KEYWORDS: New York United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Class Action Lawsuit Professional Services Legal

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo

CIGL Investor Alert: Concorde International Group Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Executives Allegedly Misled Institutional Holders: Levi & Korsinsky

CIGL Investor Alert: Concorde International Group Securities Fraud Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Executives Allegedly Misled Institutional Holders: Levi & Korsinsky

Notice to Pension Funds, Asset Managers, and Fiduciaries

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Institutional investors holding positions in Concorde International Group, Ltd. (NASDAQ: CIGL) during the Class Period of April 21, 2025, through July 14, 2025, may wish to evaluate lead plaintiff opportunities in a pending securities class action. Request an institutional investor loss assessment. You may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] or call (212) 363-7500.

CIGL shares collapsed from a Class Period high of $31.06 to approximately $2.00, representing losses exceeding 90%. Portfolios that acquired CIGL shares during the Class Period may carry material unrealized or realized losses requiring fiduciary review. The Court has set May 18, 2026 as the deadline to apply for lead plaintiff appointment.

Fiduciary Obligations and Recovery Options

Fund managers, pension trustees, and investment advisors owe duties of prudence and loyalty to their beneficiaries. Where portfolio holdings suffer losses due to alleged securities fraud, fiduciaries should evaluate whether participation in class action recovery serves the interests of plan participants and beneficiaries. The CIGL action presents such an evaluation opportunity.

  • Fiduciaries holding CIGL shares purchased between April 21, 2025, and July 14, 2025, may have standing to seek appointment as lead plaintiff
  • Lead plaintiffs help shape litigation strategy and select counsel on behalf of the entire class
  • No out-of-pocket costs are required; counsel fees are contingent upon recovery
  • Institutional investors with the largest financial interest typically receive preference under the PSLRA
  • Declining to evaluate lead plaintiff status may itself raise questions under fiduciary duty standards
  • Absent class members retain rights to share in any recovery without serving as lead plaintiff

Portfolio Impact Assessment

The lawsuit alleges that Concorde’s offering architecture featured a low public float of under 3% and concentrated insider control of 97.57% voting power, creating structural conditions that facilitated an alleged pump-and-dump promotion scheme. The complaint contends that management issued optimistic statements about contract wins and growth strategies while failing to disclose that the trading environment surrounding CIGL had become highly irregular due to social media misinformation campaigns.

Contact us for institutional recovery options or call (212) 363-7500.

“Institutional investors play a critical role in securities class actions. Their participation strengthens the class and helps ensure that recoveries reflect the full scope of alleged harm, particularly in cases involving micro-cap offerings with concentrated insider control.” — Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

Case Summary

A securities class action has been filed on behalf of purchasers of CIGL securities during the Class Period. The action asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5, alleging that the Company and certain officers made materially false and misleading statements while omitting material facts about the true nature of the trading activity in Concorde’s shares.

INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTATION — Levi & Korsinsky, LLP provides sophisticated counsel to institutional investors evaluating lead plaintiff opportunities. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars. Ranked among ISS Top 50 for seven consecutive years.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004
[email protected]
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171

KEYWORDS: New York United States North America

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS: Class Action Lawsuit Professional Services Legal

MEDIA:

Logo
Logo