{"id":983287,"date":"2026-07-21T10:34:14","date_gmt":"2026-07-21T14:34:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/bmi-shareholder-alert-badger-meter-inc-securities-class-action-lawsuit-investors-with-losses-may-contact-suewallst\/"},"modified":"2026-07-21T10:34:14","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T14:34:14","slug":"bmi-shareholder-alert-badger-meter-inc-securities-class-action-lawsuit-investors-with-losses-may-contact-suewallst","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/bmi-shareholder-alert-badger-meter-inc-securities-class-action-lawsuit-investors-with-losses-may-contact-suewallst\/","title":{"rendered":"BMI Shareholder Alert: Badger Meter, Inc. Securities Class Action Lawsuit – Investors With Losses May Contact SueWallSt"},"content":{"rendered":"

\nBadger Meter’s SEC Filings Warned of Generic Risks but Allegedly Failed to Disclose That “Short-Cycle” Demand Variability Was Already Eroding Revenue \u2014 Investors Lost Over $95 Per Share Across Three Corrective Disclosures
\n<\/h2>\n
\n

NEW YORK, July 21, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — SueWallSt notifies investors in Badger Meter, Inc. (NYSE: BMI) that a class action has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased BMI stock between April 18, 2024 and April 16, 2026.\u00a0Find out if you could qualify to recover your losses<\/u><\/a>. You may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at jlevi@SueWallSt.com<\/u><\/a> or (888) SueWallSt.<\/p>\n

BMI shares fell more than 24%, or $36.75 per share, on April 17, 2026, after the company acknowledged that “softer short-cycle municipal customer ordering” caused $15 million to $20 million in revenue shortfalls versus internal expectations. The lead plaintiff deadline is August 3, 2026.<\/p>\n

\n What the Company Disclosed in SEC Filings<\/strong>\n <\/p>\n

Throughout the Class Period, Badger Meter’s SEC filings contained standard forward-looking statement disclaimers and boilerplate risk factor language. The company’s safe harbor warnings accompanied earnings releases and conference call commentary in which executives described “ongoing favorable industry fundamentals,” “secular growth drivers,” and a “robust demand environment.” These filings did not identify any specific, contemporaneous deterioration in short-cycle municipal ordering patterns or the revenue-depleting effects of order pull-forward practices, the complaint challenges.<\/p>\n

\n What the Complaint Alleges Was Missing<\/strong>\n <\/p>\n

The securities action contends that Badger Meter’s disclosures omitted material information that was allegedly known internally:<\/p>\n