\n| \n (in thousands)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2025<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2024<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $ Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n % Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nFannie Mae<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n3,114,308<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,510,804<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,603,504<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n106<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nFreddie Mac<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,752,597<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,153,190<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n599,407<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n52<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nGinnie Mae – HUD<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n288,449<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n185,898<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n102,551<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n55<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nBrokered (1)<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n6,335,071<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n3,852,851<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2,482,220<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n64<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nPrincipal Lending and Investing (2)<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n147,800<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n214,975<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(67,175<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(31<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Debt financing volume<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 11,638,225<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6,917,718<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4,720,507<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 68<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nProperty sales volume<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2,313,585<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,530,783<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n782,802<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n51<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Total transaction volume<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 13,951,810<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8,448,501<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5,503,309<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 65<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n| \n \n(1)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \nBrokered transactions for life insurance companies, commercial banks, and other capital sources.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \n(2)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \nIncludes debt financing volumes from Walker & Dunlop Investment Partners, Inc. (\u201cWDIP\u201d) separate accounts.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n DISCUSSION OF QUARTERLY RESULTS<\/span>:<\/b><\/p>\n\n- \nTotal transaction volume grew 65% in the second quarter of 2025, reaching $14.0 billion, reflecting broad-based strength across nearly all transaction types and underscored by our strong debt financing activity with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (collectively, the \u201cGSEs\u201d).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nGSE debt financing volume increased 83% year over year, led by a 106% increase in Fannie Mae debt financing volume, one of our most-profitable products. Our year-to-date GSE lending volumes drove market share gains to 11.4%, up from 10.3% in 2024.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nFannie Mae lending volumes in the second quarter included the refinancing of a $941 million loan portfolio. Large, structured transactions generate lower margins on loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net (\u201corigination fees\u201d) and MSR income. We are seeing an increase in large transactions in the market and expect origination fee and MSR income margins to be in line with our second quarter results as we move into the second half of 2025.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nHUD debt financing volumes increased 55% in the second quarter of 2025, as our team continues to execute well in the market, evidenced by our ranking as the second largest HUD lender in 2024.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nThe 64% increase in brokered debt financing volume during the second quarter of 2025 reflected the strong supply of capital to the commercial real estate transaction markets from life insurance companies, banks, commercial-backed securities, and other private capital providers amid the ongoing rebound of the commercial real estate market after a slow start to the year.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nProperty sales volume increased 51% in the second quarter of 2025, as the macroeconomic fundamentals supporting the multifamily market; such as record supply absorptions, a significant decrease in new construction starts in most markets, and affordability of renting versus owning, continue to drive a recovery in the multifamily acquisitions market.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n MANAGED PORTFOLIO<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n (dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2025<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2024<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $ Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n % Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nFannie Mae<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n70,042,909<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n64,954,426<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n5,088,483<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nFreddie Mac<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n39,433,013<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n39,938,411<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(505,398<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nGinnie Mae – HUD<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n11,008,314<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n10,619,764<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n388,550<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nBrokered<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n16,864,888<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n17,239,417<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(374,529<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nPrincipal Lending and Investing<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n–<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n25,893<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(25,893<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(100<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Total Servicing Portfolio<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 137,349,124<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 132,777,911<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4,571,213<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nAssets under management<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n18,623,451<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n17,566,666<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,056,785<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Total Managed Portfolio<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 155,972,575<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 150,344,577<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5,627,998<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nCustodial escrow account deposits at period end (in billions)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2.7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2.7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nWeighted-average servicing fee rate (basis points)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n24.1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n24.1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nWeighted-average remaining servicing portfolio term (years)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n7.4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n7.9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n DISCUSSION OF QUARTERLY RESULTS<\/span>:<\/b><\/p>\n\n- \nOur servicing portfolio continues to grow, primarily as a result of additional Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and HUD (collectively, \u201cAgency\u201d) debt financing volumes over the past 12 months, partially offset by principal paydowns and loan payoffs.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nDuring the second quarter of 2025, we added $1.7 billion of net loans to our servicing portfolio, and over the past 12 months, we added $4.6 billion of net loans to our servicing portfolio, with the growth led primarily by Fannie Mae loans.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \n$10.9 billion of Agency loans in our servicing portfolio are scheduled to mature over the next two years. These loans, with a weighted-average servicing fee of 28.1 basis points, represent only 9% of the total Agency loans in our portfolio. Over the next five years, 50% of Agency loans will mature, providing an opportunity for us to refinance these loans in the coming years.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nThe mortgage servicing rights (\u201cMSRs\u201d) associated with our servicing portfolio had a fair value of $1.4 billion as of both June 30, 2025 and 2024.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nAssets under management totaled $18.6 billion as of June 30, 2025 and consisted of $16.0 billion of low-income housing tax credit (\u201cLIHTC\u201d) funds managed by our affordable housing investment management team, and $1.7 billion of debt funds and $0.9 billion of equity funds managed by our registered investment advisor, WDIP. The 6% increase in assets under management was primarily driven by increases in all three fund categories.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n KEY PERFORMANCE METRICS<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n (in thousands, except per share amounts)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2025<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2024<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $ Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n % Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nWalker & Dunlop net income<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n33,952<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n22,663<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n11,289<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n50<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nAdjusted EBITDA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n76,811<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n80,931<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(4,120<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Diluted EPS<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.99<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.67<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.32<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 48<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n Adjusted core EPS<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.15<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.23<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n (0.08<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n )<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n (7<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n )%<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nOperating margin<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n15<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nReturn on equity<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Key Expense Metrics (as a % of total revenues):<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nPersonnel expense<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n51<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n49<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nOther operating expenses<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n12<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n DISCUSSION OF KEY PERFORMANCE METRICS<\/span>:<\/b><\/p>\n\n- \nThe increases in Walker & Dunlop net income and diluted EPS were largely driven by the increase in total transaction volume during the quarter. Revenues increased 18%, while expenses only increased 13%, driving the expansion in our operating margin. The increase in net income was the primary factor in the growth of return on equity.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nThe increase in personnel expense as a percentage of total revenues was primarily the result of the increase in commissions due to the growth in total transaction volume for the quarter. The increase in revenues significantly outpaced a 3% rise in other operating expenses, lowering our other operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nAdjusted EBITDA decreased primarily due to decreases in placement fees and other interest income and investment management fees and an increase in personnel expense. These changes were partially offset by increases in origination fees, servicing fees, property sales broker fees, and other revenues.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nAdjusted core EPS decreased largely for the same reasons that adjusted EBITDA decreased.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n KEY CREDIT METRICS<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n (in thousands)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2025<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2024<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $ Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n % Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nAt-risk servicing portfolio (1)<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n65,378,944<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n60,122,274<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n5,256,670<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nMaximum exposure to at-risk portfolio (2)<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n13,382,410<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n12,222,290<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,160,120<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Defaulted loans<\/b>(3)<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 108,530<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 48,560<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 59,970<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 123<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n Key credit metrics (as a % of the at-risk portfolio):<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nDefaulted loans<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.17<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.08<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nAllowance for risk-sharing<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.05<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.05<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Key credit metrics (as a % of maximum exposure):<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nAllowance for risk-sharing<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.25<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.25<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n \n\n| ________________________________<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \n(1)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \nAt-risk servicing portfolio is defined as the balance of Fannie Mae Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (\u201cDUS\u201d) loans subject to the risk-sharing formula described below, as well as a small number of Freddie Mac loans on which we share in the risk of loss. Use of the at-risk portfolio provides for comparability of the full risk-sharing and modified risk-sharing loans because the provision and allowance for risk-sharing obligations are based on the at-risk balances of the associated loans. Accordingly, we have presented the key statistics as a percentage of the at-risk portfolio.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \nFor example, a $15 million loan with 50% risk-sharing has the same potential risk exposure as a $7.5 million loan with full DUS risk sharing. Accordingly, if the $15 million loan with 50% risk-sharing were to default, we would view the overall loss as a percentage of the at-risk balance, or $7.5 million, to ensure comparability between all risk-sharing obligations. To date, substantially all of the risk-sharing obligations that we have settled have been from full risk-sharing loans.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \n(2)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \nRepresents the maximum loss we would incur under our risk-sharing obligations if all of the loans we service, for which we retain some risk of loss, were to default and all of the collateral underlying these loans was determined to be without value at the time of settlement. The maximum exposure is not representative of the actual loss we would incur.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \n(3)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \nDefaulted loans represent loans in our Fannie Mae at-risk portfolio or Freddie Mac small balance pre-securitized loans (\u201cSBL\u201d) portfolio that are probable of foreclosure or that have foreclosed and for which we have recorded a collateral-based reserve (i.e., loans where we have assessed a probable loss). Other loans that are delinquent but not foreclosed or that are not probable of foreclosure are not included here. Additionally, loans that have foreclosed or are probable of foreclosure but are not expected to result in a loss to us are not included here.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n DISCUSSION OF KEY CREDIT METRICS<\/span>:<\/b><\/p>\n\n- \nOur at-risk servicing portfolio, which is comprised of loans subject to a defined risk-sharing formula, increased primarily due to the level of Fannie Mae loans added to the portfolio during the past 12 months. We take credit risk exclusively on loans backed by multifamily assets and have no credit exposure to losses in any other sector of the commercial real estate lending market.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nAs of June 30, 2025, eight at-risk loans were in default with an aggregate unpaid principal balance (\u201cUPB\u201d) of $108.5 million, unchanged from March 31, 2025, compared to five at-risk loans in default with an aggregate UPB of $48.6 million as of June 30, 2024. The collateral-based reserves on defaulted loans were $8.6 million and $5.6 million as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The approximately 3,200 remaining loans in the at-risk servicing portfolio continue to exhibit strong credit quality, with low levels of delinquencies and strong operating performance of the underlying properties in the portfolio.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nDuring 2024, the Company received requests to repurchase five GSE loans. As of June 30, 2025, the Company has repurchased four of the loans and has a forbearance and indemnification agreement in place for the other loan. The Company foreclosed on one of the repurchased loans and now holds an Other Real Estate Owned asset. The asset not yet repurchased, which must be repurchased by March 29, 2026, has a balance of $23.2 million, net of collateral posted. All repurchased and indemnified loans are delinquent and in non-accrual status.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nWe recorded a provision for credit losses of $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2025, primarily related to an updated loss reserve for a loan that previously defaulted, combined with a slight increase related to growth in the at-risk servicing portfolio.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
SECOND QUARTER 2025
\n
<\/b>FINANCIAL RESULTS BY SEGMENT<\/b><\/p>\n \nInterest expense on corporate debt is determined at a consolidated corporate level and allocated to each segment proportionally based on each segment\u2019s use of that corporate debt. Income tax expense is determined at a consolidated corporate level and allocated to each segment proportionally based on each segment\u2019s income from operations, except for significant, one-time tax activities, which are allocated entirely to the segment impacted by the tax activity. The following details explain the changes in these expense items at a consolidated corporate level:<\/p>\n \n- \nInterest expense on corporate debt, which pays a variable interest rate, decreased $1.1 million, or 6% year over year, primarily due to a decrease in short-term interest rates, partially offset by an increase in the balance of corporate debt outstanding due to our refinancing our debt in the first quarter of 2025. Our corporate debt carries a floating rate of interest tied to one-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate (\u201cSOFR\u201d) that resets monthly and changes in that index rate directly impact our cost of borrowing.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nIncome tax expense increased $4.5 million, or 57% year over year, driven by a 64% increase in income from operations and a $0.1 million shortfall in excess tax benefits in Q2 2025 compared to a $0.4 million benefit in Q2 2024. The shortfall resulted from the change between the grant date and vesting date fair values of share-based compensation that vested during the quarter. Absent the $0.5 million difference in excess tax benefits year over year, income tax expense would have increased 49%. Partially offsetting the increase due to income from operations was a reduction in losses from noncontrolling interests year over year. Losses from noncontrolling interest increase operating income upon which tax expense is calculated.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n FINANCIAL RESULTS – CAPITAL MARKETS<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n (in thousands)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2025<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2024<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $ Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n % Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nOrigination fees<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n93,764<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n63,841<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n29,923<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n47<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nMSR income<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n53,153<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n33,349<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n19,804<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n59<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nProperty sales broker fees<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n14,964<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n11,265<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n3,699<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n33<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nNet warehouse interest income (expense), loans held for sale (“LHFS”)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(1,760<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(1,950<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n190<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nOther revenues<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n12,670<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n11,665<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,005<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Total revenues<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 172,791<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 118,170<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 54,621<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 46<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nPersonnel<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n116,441<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n92,480<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n23,961<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n26<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nAmortization and depreciation<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,146<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,138<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nInterest expense on corporate debt<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n4,468<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n5,299<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(831<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(16<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nOther operating expenses<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n5,309<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n4,642<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n667<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Total expenses<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 127,364<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 103,559<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 23,805<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 23<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n Income (loss) from operations<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n45,427<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n14,611<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n30,816<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n211<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nIncome tax expense (benefit)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n12,285<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n3,359<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n8,926<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n266<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 33,142<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 11,252<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 21,890<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 195<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nLess: net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u2014<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n213<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(213<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(100<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Walker & Dunlop net income (loss)<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 33,142<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 11,039<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 22,103<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 200<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n Key revenue metrics (as a % of debt financing volume):<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nOrigination fee rate (1)<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.82<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.95<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nAgency MSR rate (2)<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1.03<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1.17<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Key performance metrics:<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nOperating margin<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n26<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n12<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nAdjusted EBITDA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,323<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(8,532<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n9,855<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(116<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nDiluted EPS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.97<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.33<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n0.64<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n194<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n \n\n| ____________________________________<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| (1)<\/td>\n | | \n\n \nOrigination fees as a percentage of debt financing volume. Excludes the income and debt financing volume from Principal Lending and Investing.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| (2)<\/td>\n | | \n\n \nMSR income as a percentage of Agency debt financing volume.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n CAPITAL MARKETS \u2013 DISCUSSION OF QUARTERLY RESULTS<\/span>:<\/b><\/p>\nThe Capital Markets segment includes our Agency lending, debt brokerage, property sales, appraisal and valuation services, investment banking, and housing market research businesses.<\/i><\/p>\n\n- \nThe increase in origination fees was primarily the result of the increase in our overall debt financing volume, particularly the 81% increase in our Agency debt financing volume during the second quarter of 2025 (Agency debt financing volume has higher origination fees than our brokered volume), partially offset by a decline in the origination fee rate due to (i) the competitive environment in the multifamily debt financing market during the quarter and (ii) the aforementioned large Fannie Mae portfolio originated in the second quarter of 2025, with no comparable activity in the second quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nThe increase in MSR income was largely a result of the increase in Agency debt financing volume year over year, partially offset by a decrease in the Agency MSR rate. The Agency MSR rate decreased due to a decline in the weighted-average servicing fee (\u201cWASF\u201d) on Fannie Mae originations and a decrease in the loan term. The WASF on our Fannie Mae loans declined due to (i) the aforementioned competitive environment and (ii) the aforementioned large Fannie Mae portfolio originated in the second quarter of 2025. The loan term has decreased as more of our borrowers are opting for five-year loan terms in light of the volatility and uncertainty surrounding long-term interest rates, and we expect this trend to continue.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nProperty sales broker fees increased year over year primarily due to the 51% increase in property sales volume, partially offset by a decline in the margin on the sales due to the competitive multifamily environment noted previously.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nPersonnel expense increased in the second quarter of 2025 primarily due to (i) an increase in variable compensation expenses, resulting from the growth in transaction volume year over year, (ii) salaries and benefits costs due largely to a 5% increase in average segment headcount, and (iii) an increase in severance expense resulting from the separation of several underperforming producers.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nThe increase in adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to increases in origination fees and property sales broker fees, primarily driven by the improvement in transaction volumes, partially offset by increased personnel expense.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n FINANCIAL RESULTS – SERVICING & ASSET MANAGEMENT<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n (in thousands)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2025<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2024<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $ Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n % Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nOrigination fees<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n545<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,493<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(948<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(63<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nServicing fees<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n83,693<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n80,418<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n3,275<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nInvestment management fees<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n7,577<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n14,822<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(7,245<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(49<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nNet warehouse interest income, loans held for investment<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u2014<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n366<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(366<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(100<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nPlacement fees and other interest income<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n32,651<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n37,170<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(4,519<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(12<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nOther revenues<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n16,269<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n13,963<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2,306<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n17<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Total revenues<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 140,735<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 148,232<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n (7,497<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n )<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n (5<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n )%<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nPersonnel<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n22,743<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n20,077<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2,666<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n13<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nAmortization and depreciation<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n55,882<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n53,173<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2,709<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nProvision (benefit) for credit losses<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,820<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2,936<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(1,116<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(38<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nInterest expense on corporate debt<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n10,810<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n10,946<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(136<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nOther operating expenses<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n6,514<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n6,728<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(214<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Total expenses<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 97,769<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 93,860<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3,909<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n Income (loss) from operations<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n42,966<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n54,372<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(11,406<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(21<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nIncome tax expense (benefit)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n5,428<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n16,521<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(11,093<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(67<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 37,538<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 37,851<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n (313<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n )<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n (1<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n )%<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nLess: net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(2,581<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2,578<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(100<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Walker & Dunlop net income (loss)<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 37,541<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 40,432<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n (2,891<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n )<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n (7<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n )%<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n Key performance metrics:<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nOperating margin<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n31<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n37<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nAdjusted EBITDA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n111,931<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n124,502<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(12,571<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nDiluted EPS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1.10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1.19<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | | \n\n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(0.09<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n SERVICING & ASSET MANAGEMENT \u2013 DISCUSSION OF QUARTERLY RESULTS<\/span>:<\/b><\/p>\nThe Servicing & Asset Management segment includes loan servicing, principal lending and investing, management of third-party capital invested in tax credit equity funds focused on the affordable housing sector and other commercial real estate, and real estate-related investment banking and advisory services.<\/i><\/p>\n\n- \nThe $4.6 billion net increase in the servicing portfolio over the past 12 months was the principal driver of the growth in servicing fees year over year.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nInvestment management fees decreased primarily due to a reduction in the accrual for investment management fees from our LIHTC funds that are driven by asset dispositions within the funds, partially offset by an increase in revenues from our private credit investment management strategies. The reduction in the accrual for LIHTC investment management fees was due to fewer expected asset dispositions in 2025 than 2024 and a reduction in the expected collections for the year due to the challenging market dynamics in the LIHTC space.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nPlacement fees and other interest income decreased primarily due to a lower average placement fee rate driven by lower short-term interest rates year over year.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nThe increase in other revenues was primarily related to an increase in syndication fees earned from our LIHTC operations as we syndicated a large fund in 2025, resulting in a 45% increase in gross equity placed.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nPersonnel costs increased due to a combination of incremental increases in salaries and benefits, commissions, and bonus accruals.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nThe increase in amortization and depreciation was primarily driven by an increase in amortization of MSRs.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
- \nThe decrease in adjusted EBITDA was primarily related to decreases in placement fees and other interest income and investment management fees.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n| \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n FINANCIAL RESULTS – CORPORATE<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n (in thousands)<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2025<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Q2 2024<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $ Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n % Variance<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nOther interest income<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n3,335<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n3,870<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(535<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nOther revenues<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2,379<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n404<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,975<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n489<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Total revenues<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5,714<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4,274<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,440<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 34<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n \nPersonnel<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n22,704<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n20,510<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n$<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2,194<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n11<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nAmortization and depreciation<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,908<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,732<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n176<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nInterest expense on corporate debt<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,489<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n1,629<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(140<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n(9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n \nOther operating expenses<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n21,632<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n21,189<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n443<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n Total expenses<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 47,733<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 45,060<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n $<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2,673<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n \n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n %<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| \n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |