{"id":859063,"date":"2025-06-10T09:31:47","date_gmt":"2025-06-10T13:31:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/"},"modified":"2025-06-10T09:31:47","modified_gmt":"2025-06-10T13:31:47","slug":"investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/","title":{"rendered":"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mw_release\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align:left\">Will Salesforce Retaliate against PMI Despite Federal Whistleblower Protections?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\">SAN FRANCISCO, June  10, 2025  (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) &#8212; In a move that may constitute a serious breach of Delaware law, Salesforce\u2019s (NYSE: CRM) legal team has effectively blocked board-level review of 10 formal \u201cRed Flag\u201d notices filed by Proof Mark, Inc. (PMI), a partner and minority shareholder.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">The easy question to ask is, \u201cwhy would they do that?\u201d<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">The notices, submitted between March and June 2025, identify material risks involving governance breakdowns, data trust erosion, and acts of partner reprisal.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Salesforce\u2019s outside counsel refused to escalate the notices to the board in a letter dated May 2, 2025.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">However, Delaware law is unambiguous: officers and counsel do not have discretion to suppress Red Flag notices sent to the board of directors. Stuart Wilson, PMI counsel, said, \u201cAny shareholder would be interested in the fact sets and the questions posed in PMI\u2019s Red Flags.\u201d<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">\n        <strong>Delaware Law: Suppressing Risk Notices Is a Fiduciary Breach<\/strong>\n      <\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">In Hughes v. Hu, the Delaware Chancery Court affirmed a critical board-level obligation:<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">\u201cA board cannot blindly defer to the conclusions of management or counsel when credible warnings are raised\u2026 Directors have an obligation to probe, question, and act\u2014even if management attempts to dismiss the concerns.\u201d<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">\u201cFailure to investigate red flags, even when labeled legally immaterial by insiders, constitutes bad faith.\u201d<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">(Hughes v. Hu, C.A. No. 2019-0112-JTL, 2020 WL 1987029)<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">These omissions\u2014failure to escalate, investigate, or act\u2014expose directors and officers to personal liability under Caremark and McDonald\u2019s. (re McDonald\u2019s Corp. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 2021-0324-JTL)<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">\n        <strong>Suppression of Red Flags Hurts All Salesforce Shareholders<\/strong>\n      <\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">The Red Flag notices have been posted at https:\/\/www.substack.com\/@proofmarkinc and submitted to SEC and DOJ. The filings detail:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Platform coercion and retaliation<\/li>\n<li>Breakdown of internal controls<\/li>\n<li>Governance suppression and data trust failures<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\">\n        <strong>Potential federal violations include:<\/strong>\n      <\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Regulation S-K, Item 105 \u2013 failure to disclose material risks<\/li>\n<li>Exchange Act Rule 14a-9 \u2013 misleading omissions<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\">\n        <strong>Informatica Merger Implications<\/strong>\n      <\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Salesforce is pursuing regulatory approval for its acquisition of Informatica, a respected enterprise data infrastructure provider. But its suppression of internal risk disclosures raises urgent concerns:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Can a company that filters what its board can see govern a major acquisition without conflicts of interest?<\/li>\n<li>Are Salesforce\u2019s internal escalation and compliance processes truly operational\u2014or selectively enforced?<\/li>\n<li>If partner coercion and Red Flag suppression occurred inside the Salesforce ecosystem, what prevents similar failures from extending into Informatica\u2019s?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\">\n        <strong>Blanket Legal Representation Asserted Without Consent<\/strong>\n      <\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">In a letter dated May 28, 2025, Salesforce\u2019s outside counsel claimed to represent the company, its board, officers, and \u201cany employees listed\u201d in PMI\u2019s Red Flag disclosures. No conflict waivers or individual consents were provided.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">This raises serious ethical concerns under:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>New York Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4, 1.7, 1.13<\/li>\n<li>NYC Bar Opinion 2004-02<\/li>\n<li>ABA Formal Opinion 91-361<\/li>\n<li>Delaware precedent in Oracle and Disney<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\">Under these authorities, joint representation is impermissible without specific, informed consent\u2014particularly when fiduciary duties may diverge or conflicts arise.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">\n        <strong>Regulatory and Investor Engagement Underway<\/strong>\n      <\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">PMI\u2019s board has received whistleblower protections from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other federal agencies. All documents, correspondence, and legal filings are being shared with:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Institutional investors<\/li>\n<li>Proxy advisory firms<\/li>\n<li>Governance analysts<\/li>\n<li>Federal and state regulators<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\">Far more importantly, institutional investors, regulators, and antitrust authorities now face a direct question:<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">\n        <strong>Can fiduciary oversight exist if management shields the board from shareholder-submitted risk disclosures?<\/strong>\n      <\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Full materials are available at: https:\/\/www.substack.com\/@proofmarkinc<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Media: investor.relations@proof.world<\/p>\n<p>      <img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" class=\"__GNW8366DE3E__IMG\" src=\"https:\/\/www.globenewswire.com\/newsroom\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw==\" \/><br \/>\n      <br \/>\n      <img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/ml.globenewswire.com\/media\/ZmU4ZTcyY2EtMTMxNy00YzU1LThmNmYtMmE5ZGU0NTAzZDYzLTUwMDE0Nzk1My0yMDI1LTA2LTEwLWVu\/tiny\/Proof-Mark-Inc-.png\" \/>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"mw_contactinfo\"><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Will Salesforce Retaliate against PMI Despite Federal Whistleblower Protections? SAN FRANCISCO, June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) &#8212; In a move that may constitute a serious breach of Delaware law, Salesforce\u2019s (NYSE: CRM) legal team has effectively blocked board-level review of 10 formal \u201cRed Flag\u201d notices filed by Proof Mark, Inc. (PMI), a partner and minority shareholder. The easy question to ask is, \u201cwhy would they do that?\u201d The notices, submitted between March and June 2025, identify material risks involving governance breakdowns, data trust erosion, and acts of partner reprisal. Salesforce\u2019s outside counsel refused to escalate the notices to the board in a letter dated May 2, 2025. However, Delaware law is unambiguous: officers and counsel do not have discretion to &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-859063","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices - Market Newsdesk<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices - Market Newsdesk\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Will Salesforce Retaliate against PMI Despite Federal Whistleblower Protections? SAN FRANCISCO, June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) &#8212; In a move that may constitute a serious breach of Delaware law, Salesforce\u2019s (NYSE: CRM) legal team has effectively blocked board-level review of 10 formal \u201cRed Flag\u201d notices filed by Proof Mark, Inc. (PMI), a partner and minority shareholder. The easy question to ask is, \u201cwhy would they do that?\u201d The notices, submitted between March and June 2025, identify material risks involving governance breakdowns, data trust erosion, and acts of partner reprisal. Salesforce\u2019s outside counsel refused to escalate the notices to the board in a letter dated May 2, 2025. However, Delaware law is unambiguous: officers and counsel do not have discretion to &hellip; Continue reading &quot;Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Market Newsdesk\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-10T13:31:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.globenewswire.com\/newsroom\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw==\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Newsdesk\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Newsdesk\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Newsdesk\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/482f27a394d4fda80ecb5499e519d979\"},\"headline\":\"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-10T13:31:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":592,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.globenewswire.com\\\/newsroom\\\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw==\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/\",\"name\":\"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices - Market Newsdesk\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.globenewswire.com\\\/newsroom\\\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw==\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-10T13:31:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/482f27a394d4fda80ecb5499e519d979\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.globenewswire.com\\\/newsroom\\\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw==\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.globenewswire.com\\\/newsroom\\\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw==\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Market Newsdesk\",\"description\":\"Latest Business News in Real Time\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/482f27a394d4fda80ecb5499e519d979\",\"name\":\"Newsdesk\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a0d0bd5b0f0ca12a265a459b13169dac35f33776d8501eda5e68844a366f2f46?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a0d0bd5b0f0ca12a265a459b13169dac35f33776d8501eda5e68844a366f2f46?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a0d0bd5b0f0ca12a265a459b13169dac35f33776d8501eda5e68844a366f2f46?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Newsdesk\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\\\/index.php\\\/author\\\/newsdesk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices - Market Newsdesk","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices - Market Newsdesk","og_description":"Will Salesforce Retaliate against PMI Despite Federal Whistleblower Protections? SAN FRANCISCO, June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) &#8212; In a move that may constitute a serious breach of Delaware law, Salesforce\u2019s (NYSE: CRM) legal team has effectively blocked board-level review of 10 formal \u201cRed Flag\u201d notices filed by Proof Mark, Inc. (PMI), a partner and minority shareholder. The easy question to ask is, \u201cwhy would they do that?\u201d The notices, submitted between March and June 2025, identify material risks involving governance breakdowns, data trust erosion, and acts of partner reprisal. Salesforce\u2019s outside counsel refused to escalate the notices to the board in a letter dated May 2, 2025. However, Delaware law is unambiguous: officers and counsel do not have discretion to &hellip; Continue reading \"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices\"","og_url":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/","og_site_name":"Market Newsdesk","article_published_time":"2025-06-10T13:31:47+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/www.globenewswire.com\/newsroom\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw==","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Newsdesk","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Newsdesk","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/"},"author":{"name":"Newsdesk","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/#\/schema\/person\/482f27a394d4fda80ecb5499e519d979"},"headline":"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices","datePublished":"2025-06-10T13:31:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/"},"wordCount":592,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.globenewswire.com\/newsroom\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw==","inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/","url":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/","name":"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices - Market Newsdesk","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.globenewswire.com\/newsroom\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw==","datePublished":"2025-06-10T13:31:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/#\/schema\/person\/482f27a394d4fda80ecb5499e519d979"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.globenewswire.com\/newsroom\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw==","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.globenewswire.com\/newsroom\/ti?nf=OTQ2NTk5OCM2OTgyNDgyIzUwMDE0Nzk1Mw=="},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/investor-alert-salesforce-counsel-blocks-board-review-of-proof-mark-inc-red-flag-notices\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Investor Alert: Salesforce Counsel Blocks Board Review of Proof Mark, Inc. \u201cRed Flag\u201d Notices"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/","name":"Market Newsdesk","description":"Latest Business News in Real Time","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/#\/schema\/person\/482f27a394d4fda80ecb5499e519d979","name":"Newsdesk","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a0d0bd5b0f0ca12a265a459b13169dac35f33776d8501eda5e68844a366f2f46?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a0d0bd5b0f0ca12a265a459b13169dac35f33776d8501eda5e68844a366f2f46?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a0d0bd5b0f0ca12a265a459b13169dac35f33776d8501eda5e68844a366f2f46?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Newsdesk"},"url":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/author\/newsdesk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/859063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=859063"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/859063\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=859063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=859063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketnewsdesk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=859063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}